spamassassin-talk  

Messages by Date

• 2003/06/30 [SAtalk] A question or two... Wendell Smith
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] "Naughty" test names Tony Earnshaw
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] Re: misc virus warnings... Vivek Khera
• 2003/06/30 [SAtalk] Problem W / Postfix SpamAssassin transport Nichols, William
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] "Naughty" test names Matt Kettler
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] why is this not caught? Matt Kettler
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] How do I know whether Bayes is working or not? Kris Deugau
• 2003/06/30 [SAtalk] Spamassassin and qmail-scanner Joe Young
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] "full" test and attachments Matt Kettler
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] How do I know whether Bayes is working or not? Justin Mason
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] How do I know whether Bayes is working or not? Martin Radford
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] "Naughty" test names Martin Radford
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] where to install.. Tony Earnshaw
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] "Naughty" test names Tony Earnshaw
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] How do I know whether Bayes is working or not? Theo Van Dinter
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] How do I know whether Bayes is working or not? Jim Ford
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] How do I know whether Bayes is working or not? Justin Mason
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] New (to me) spam technique Justin Mason
• 2003/06/30 [SAtalk] Wrapping spamassassin in a multi-threaded C program? Joe Flowers
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] How do I know whether Bayes is working or not? Patrick Morris
• 2003/06/30 [SAtalk] SA with sendmail Dennis Breithaupt
• 2003/06/30 [SAtalk] Re: Quick question Luis Hernán Otegui
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] How do I know whether Bayes is working or not? Chris Halverson
• 2003/06/30 RE: [SAtalk] New (to me) spam technique Matt Kettler
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] New (to me) spam technique mikea
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] "Naughty" test names Bob Apthorpe
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] How do I know whether Bayes is working or not? Morten Kjeldgaard
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] How do I know whether Bayes is working or not? SqM
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] Solaris , Sendmail & SpamAssassin Luis Hernán Otegui
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] How do I know whether Bayes is working or not? Kai Schaetzl
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] Need rule to filter out spying <img> tags Kai Schaetzl
• 2003/06/30 RE: [SAtalk] New (to me) spam technique Darren Coleman
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] How do I know whether Bayes is working or not? Leo Huang
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] where to install.. Leo Huang
• 2003/06/30 [SAtalk] where to install.. Céline REDON
• 2003/06/30 [SAtalk] New (to me) spam technique Robert Menschel
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] How do I know whether Bayes is working or not? SqM
• 2003/06/30 [SAtalk] "full" test and attachments honema
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] 2.60-cvs (20030627) rules ODHIAMBO Washington
• 2003/06/30 RE: [SAtalk] "Naughty" test names Darren Coleman
• 2003/06/30 RE: [SAtalk] Need rule to filter out spying <img> tags Darren Coleman
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] BUGGY_CGI? Kai Schaetzl
• 2003/06/30 [SAtalk] How do I know whether Bayes is working or not? Leo Huang
• 2003/06/30 RE: Re[2]: [SAtalk] "Naughty" test names Bill
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] "Naughty" test names Ralph Seichter
• 2003/06/30 [SAtalk] Creative spam, any ideas? Ralf Guenthner
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] BUGGY_CGI? Kai Schaetzl
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] Re: Application MBR
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] 2.60-cvs (20030627) rules Martin Radford
• 2003/06/30 [SAtalk] why is this not caught? Martin Maechler
• 2003/06/29 [SAtalk] 2.60-cvs (20030627) rules ODHIAMBO Washington
• 2003/06/29 [SAtalk] Houghton Internationals' Anti-virus Service, Antigen, found FILEFILTER= *.pif file ANTIGEN_VF_EXCHANGE01
• 2003/06/29 [SAtalk] Houghton Internationals' Anti-virus Service, Antigen, found FILEFILTER= *.pif file ANTIGEN_VF_EXCHANGE01
• 2003/06/29 [SAtalk] Blocked File Attachment Mail Adminstrator
• 2003/06/29 [SAtalk] Blocked File Attachment Mail Adminstrator
• 2003/06/29 Re: [SAtalk] Re: Application Albert Croft
• 2003/06/29 Re: Re[2]: [SAtalk] "Naughty" test names Justin Mason
• 2003/06/29 [SAtalk] ScanMail Message: To Recipient virus found and action taken. System Attendant
• 2003/06/29 [SAtalk] ScanMail Message: To Recipient virus found and action taken. System Attendant
• 2003/06/29 [SAtalk] Report to Recipient(s) LTREEUS2
• 2003/06/29 [SAtalk] Report to Recipient(s) LTREEUS2
• 2003/06/29 [SAtalk] Report to Recipient(s) LTREEUS2
• 2003/06/29 [SAtalk] Report to Recipient(s) LTREEUS2
• 2003/06/29 Re[2]: [SAtalk] "Naughty" test names Abigail Marshall
• 2003/06/29 Re[2]: [SAtalk] BUGGY_CGI? Abigail Marshall
• 2003/06/29 Re: [SAtalk] 2.60 final and CVS Justin Mason
• 2003/06/29 Re: [SAtalk] High Bayes scores with 2.60-pr1 Justin Mason
• 2003/06/29 Re: [SAtalk] 2.60 RC1 make test errors (not Invalid Date) Theo Van Dinter
• 2003/06/29 Re: [SAtalk] 2.60 final and CVS Simon Byrnand
• 2003/06/29 Re: [SAtalk] 2.60 final and CVS Theo Van Dinter
• 2003/06/29 [SAtalk] merge sh script SA caller into .procmailrc Dan Jacobson
• 2003/06/29 Re: [SAtalk] 2.60 final and CVS Simon Byrnand
• 2003/06/29 Fwd: Re: [SAtalk] 2.60 final and CVS Simon Byrnand
• 2003/06/29 Re: [SAtalk] 2.60 final and CVS Theo Van Dinter
• 2003/06/29 RE: [SAtalk] BUGGY_CGI? Mad Martian
• 2003/06/29 RE: [SAtalk] BUGGY_CGI? Mad Martian
• 2003/06/29 RE: [SAtalk] BUGGY_CGI? Mad Martian
• 2003/06/29 Re: [SAtalk] Solaris , Sendmail & SpamAssassin Bob Apthorpe
• 2003/06/29 [SAtalk] Is this "machine-homogenized intrisic pork-offal-vegetable-based-brains-likewisecanned substance" [Fwd: Ode to the Love : invitation] Tony Earnshaw
• 2003/06/29 Re: [SAtalk] 2.60 final and CVS Simon Byrnand
• 2003/06/29 RE: [SAtalk] Report to Recipient(s) Simon Byrnand
• 2003/06/29 RE: [SAtalk] BUGGY_CGI? Mad Martian
• 2003/06/29 Re: [SAtalk] BUGGY_CGI? Bob Apthorpe
• 2003/06/29 Re: [SAtalk] Conflicting scores in SA/MailScanner Simon Byrnand
• 2003/06/29 Re: [SAtalk] New Domain spam Kai Schaetzl
• 2003/06/29 Re: [SAtalk] BUGGY_CGI? Kai Schaetzl
• 2003/06/29 Re: [SAtalk] New Domain spam Thomas Cameron
• 2003/06/29 Re: [SAtalk] BUGGY_CGI? Matt Kettler
• 2003/06/29 [SAtalk] High Bayes scores with 2.60-pr1 Martin Radford
• 2003/06/29 Re: [SAtalk] BUGGY_CGI? Martin Radford
• 2003/06/29 Re: [SAtalk] New Domain spam Steve Phariss
• 2003/06/29 Re: [SAtalk] Spammers using bounces and encoding Jerry Bell
• 2003/06/29 [SAtalk] BUGGY_CGI? Spam Sucks
• 2003/06/29 Re: [SAtalk] Spammers using bounces and encoding SqM
• 2003/06/29 [SAtalk] spamassassin and razor won't work together Christof Wessely
• 2003/06/29 [SAtalk] spamassassin and razor won't work together Chris
• 2003/06/29 Re: [SAtalk] Spammers using bounces and encoding Jerry Bell
• 2003/06/29 Re: [SAtalk] Spammers using bounces and encoding SqM
• 2003/06/29 Re: [SAtalk] "Naughty" test names Benjamin A. Shelton
• 2003/06/29 [SAtalk] 2.60 RC1 make test errors (not Invalid Date) Jay Levitt
• 2003/06/29 Re: [SAtalk] Spammers using bounces and encoding Frank Pineau
• 2003/06/29 [SAtalk] Spammers using bounces and encoding Michael Long
• 2003/06/29 Re: [SAtalk] This one got through (and an idea). Frank Pineau
• 2003/06/29 Re: [SAtalk] "Naughty" test names Yorkshire Dave
• 2003/06/29 Re: [SAtalk] "Naughty" test names Mark Lowes
• 2003/06/29 [SAtalk] This one got through (and an idea). Steve Prior
• 2003/06/29 Re: [SAtalk] "Naughty" test names adam
• 2003/06/29 Re: [SAtalk] "Naughty" test names Chr. von Stuckrad
• 2003/06/29 Re: [SAtalk] New Domain spam Kai Schaetzl
• 2003/06/29 Re: [SAtalk] "Naughty" test names Kai Schaetzl
• 2003/06/29 Re: [SAtalk] Don't check it twice (how-to newbie question) Paul-Henri Lampe
• 2003/06/28 [SAtalk] New Domain spam Steve Phariss
• 2003/06/28 Re: [SAtalk] Need rule to filter out spying <img> tags Robert Menschel
• 2003/06/28 Re: [SAtalk] Chinese spam vs. Chinese non spam Justin Mason
• 2003/06/28 Re: [SAtalk] [Fwd: FWD: national opt-out directory] Thomas Cameron
• 2003/06/28 Re: [SAtalk] pre-release: SpamAssassin 2.60 beta now available Martin Radford
• 2003/06/28 [SAtalk] Chinese spam vs. Chinese non spam Dan Jacobson
• 2003/06/28 Re: [SAtalk] Need rule to filter out spying <img> tags MBR
• 2003/06/28 Re: [SAtalk] "Naughty" test names Benjamin A. Shelton
• 2003/06/28 Re: [SAtalk] Need rule to filter out spying <img> tags Tony Earnshaw
• 2003/06/28 [SAtalk] My Server is Working Again Greg Ennis
• 2003/06/28 Re: [SAtalk] a non-perl guru trying to install SA 2.55 on RH 9.0 Michael W. Cocke
• 2003/06/28 RE: [SAtalk] Need rule to filter out spying <img> tags Mathew Hendry
• 2003/06/28 Re: [SAtalk] a non-perl guru trying to install SA 2.55 on RH 9.0 Kai Schaetzl
• 2003/06/28 Re: [SAtalk] Postfix error: Client host rejected: cannot find your hostname. Ralf Hildebrandt
• 2003/06/28 Re: [SAtalk] "Naughty" test names rODbegbie
• 2003/06/28 Re: [SAtalk] a non-perl guru trying to install SA 2.55 on RH 9.0 Theo Van Dinter
• 2003/06/28 [SAtalk] Need rule to filter out spying <img> tags MBR
• 2003/06/28 [SAtalk] Re: OT: Business host w/SA needed Robert Menschel
• 2003/06/28 Re: [SAtalk] "Naughty" test names Martin Radford
• 2003/06/28 Re: [SAtalk] Postfix error: Client host rejected: cannot find yourhostname. Shaun T. Erickson
• 2003/06/28 [SAtalk] [Fwd: FWD: national opt-out directory] Warren Togami
• 2003/06/28 [SAtalk] a non-perl guru trying to install SA 2.55 on RH 9.0 Michael W. Cocke
• 2003/06/28 Re: [SAtalk] Postfix error: Client host rejected: cannot find yourhostname. Tony Earnshaw
• 2003/06/28 RE: [SAtalk] easy way to run spamassassin -r on large ammounts of SPAM Abel Jeffcoat
• 2003/06/28 Re: [SAtalk] Installing spamassasin... Martin Radford
• 2003/06/28 Re: [SAtalk] SA Marks AOL Bounce messages as spam Tony Earnshaw
• 2003/06/28 Re: [SAtalk] Postfix error: Client host rejected: cannot find yourhostname. Tony Earnshaw
• 2003/06/28 Re: [SAtalk] "Naughty" test names Tony Earnshaw
• 2003/06/28 Re: [SAtalk] Installing spamassasin... Tony Earnshaw
• 2003/06/28 [SAtalk] Postfix error: Client host rejected: cannot find your hostname. Oleg Aronov
• 2003/06/28 Re: [SAtalk] "Naughty" test names Kai Schaetzl
• 2003/06/28 Re: [SAtalk] "Naughty" test names Kai Schaetzl
• 2003/06/28 [SAtalk] easy way to run spamassassin -r on large ammounts of SPAM Jack Snodgrass
• 2003/06/28 Re: [SAtalk] SA Marks AOL Bounce messages as spam Martin Radford
• 2003/06/28 Re: [SAtalk] FORGED_MUA_AOL and AOL employees Martin Radford
• 2003/06/28 Re: [SAtalk] Installing spamassasin... Martin Radford
• 2003/06/28 Re: [SAtalk] "Naughty" test names Ralph Seichter
• 2003/06/28 Re: [SAtalk] 2.60 final and CVS Kai Schaetzl
• 2003/06/28 Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin, Solaris 8 & Sendmail Hannu Liljemark
• 2003/06/28 Re: [SAtalk] spamd/spamc Hannu Liljemark
• 2003/06/27 [SAtalk] SA Marks AOL Bounce messages as spam Andrew Joakimsen
• 2003/06/27 Re: [SAtalk] Installing spamassasin... Tony Earnshaw
• 2003/06/27 Re: [SAtalk] "Naughty" test names Bob Proulx
• 2003/06/27 Re: [SAtalk] "Naughty" test names Shaun T. Erickson
• 2003/06/27 Re: [SAtalk] "Naughty" test names Matthew Cline
• 2003/06/27 Re: Re[2]: [SAtalk] New trick Daniel Quinlan
• 2003/06/27 Re: [SAtalk] "Naughty" test names Benjamin A. Shelton
• 2003/06/27 Re: [SAtalk] "Naughty" test names Benjamin A. Shelton
• 2003/06/27 Re: [SAtalk] Installing spamassasin... Matt Kettler
• 2003/06/27 Re[4]: [SAtalk] New trick Robert Menschel
• 2003/06/27 Re: [SAtalk] "Naughty" test names Robin Lynn Frank
• 2003/06/27 Re: Re[2]: [SAtalk] New trick Justin Mason
• 2003/06/27 Re[2]: [SAtalk] New trick Robert Menschel
• 2003/06/27 Re[2]: [SAtalk] Re: misc virus warnings... Abigail Marshall
• 2003/06/27 [SAtalk] Installing spamassasin... Brad
• 2003/06/27 Re: [SAtalk] "Naughty" test names Satya
• 2003/06/27 [SAtalk] Solaris , Sendmail & SpamAssassin Patrick Murphy
• 2003/06/27 [SAtalk] SpamAssassin, Solaris 8 & Sendmail Patrick Murphy
• 2003/06/27 [SAtalk] X-Spam-Report Clement
• 2003/06/27 Re: [spamassassin] Re: [SAtalk] "Naughty" test names Robin Lynn Frank
• 2003/06/27 Re: [spamassassin] Re: [SAtalk] "Naughty" test names Alan Leghart
• 2003/06/27 Re: [spamassassin] Re: [SAtalk] "Naughty" test names Don Krause
• 2003/06/27 Re: [SAtalk] question: how to match '@' in body test Matt Kettler
• 2003/06/27 Re: [SAtalk] FORGED_MUA_AOL and AOL employees Matt Kettler
• 2003/06/27 [SAtalk] FORGED_MUA_AOL and AOL employees Bryan Field-Elliot
• 2003/06/27 Re: [SAtalk] "Naughty" test names Ernest W. Lessenger
• 2003/06/27 [SAtalk] question: how to match '@' in body test Marvin Raab
• 2003/06/27 Re: [SAtalk] "Naughty" test names Yorkshire Dave
• 2003/06/27 Re: [SAtalk] Ideas on dealing with Joe Job? Kelson Vibber
• 2003/06/27 Re: [SAtalk] New trick Matt Kettler
• 2003/06/27 Re: [SAtalk] Re: "Naughty" test names Martin Radford
• 2003/06/27 [SAtalk] Re: "Naughty" test names Tom Diehl
• 2003/06/27 Re: [SAtalk] "Naughty" test names Robin Lynn Frank
• 2003/06/27 Re: [SAtalk] OT-spam virus? anyone heard of this? Matt Kettler
• 2003/06/27 Re: [SAtalk] New trick Martin Radford
• 2003/06/27 Re: [SAtalk] New trick Martin Radford
• 2003/06/27 Re: [SAtalk] "Naughty" test names Bernard Robbins
• 2003/06/27 RE: [SAtalk] OT-spam virus? anyone heard of this? SpamTalk
• 2003/06/27 RE: [SAtalk] New trick Eetu Rantanen
• 2003/06/27 Re: [SAtalk] "Naughty" test names Benjamin A. Shelton
• 2003/06/27 [SAtalk] "Naughty" test names Rick Beebe
• 2003/06/27 Re: [SAtalk] OT-spam virus? anyone heard of this? William Stearns
• 2003/06/27 Re: [SAtalk] 2.60 final and CVS Justin Mason
• 2003/06/27 Re: [SAtalk] OT-spam virus? anyone heard of this? Alan Leghart
• 2003/06/27 Re: [SAtalk] Re: misc virus warnings... Yorkshire Dave
• 2003/06/27 [SAtalk] OT-spam virus? anyone heard of this? Chris Santerre
• 2003/06/27 Re: [SAtalk] 2.60 final and CVS Kai Schaetzl
• 2003/06/27 Re: [SAtalk] Re: misc virus warnings... Steve Prior
• 2003/06/27 Re: [SAtalk] Missed this spam Jason

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]