On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 03:22:39PM +0100, Darren Coleman wrote:
> It would be nice, although ultimately unworkable I guess, if SA could be
> engineered to ignore anything which isn't humanly-visible in an email.
> i.e. when spammers insert fake PGP signatures in <font
> color="White"></font> tags to lower their score - SA should ignore it.
> 
> The problem with this, I guess, is that not only would it be near
> impossible to catch every permutation of "hiding content", but you would
> also potentially miss glaring spam signatures that are hidden.. e.g.
> <!-- Created by SpamPro (c) 2003 -->

I disagree strongly here. 

IMHO there should be SA rules to find <foo>-colored text on 
<foo>-colored background; I'd score this up very high indeed.

-- 
Mike Andrews
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tired old sysadmin since 1964


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100006ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/01
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to