spamassassin-talk  

Messages by Date

• 2003/07/02 Re: [SAtalk] spamassassin WEB interface Rick Macdougall
• 2003/07/02 Re: OT: [SAtalk] Only 1.3 score by spamassassin Bart Schaefer
• 2003/07/02 Re: [SAtalk] Hormel sues Bob Apthorpe
• 2003/07/02 Re: [SAtalk] Metrics / Statistics question Hannu Liljemark
• 2003/07/02 [SAtalk] Martijn/Martin/Marten Beverlander Tony Earnshaw
• 2003/07/02 Re: [SAtalk] 2.60 and Base 64 enc text? Tony Earnshaw
• 2003/07/02 [SAtalk] spamassassin WEB interface Jose M.Herrera
• 2003/07/02 Re: OT: [SAtalk] Only 1.3 score by spamassassin Kai Schaetzl
• 2003/07/02 [SAtalk] Re: GA Submission Theo Van Dinter
• 2003/07/02 Re: [SAtalk] sa-learn and premunged reports Kai Schaetzl
• 2003/07/02 Re: [SAtalk] MAPS RBL+ problem David B Funk
• 2003/07/02 [SAtalk] Whitlisted but not John McCoy, Jr
• 2003/07/02 [SAtalk] Why are local users getting marked as spam? Ian Zabel
• 2003/07/02 [SAtalk] sa-learn and premunged reports Yuval Kojman
• 2003/07/02 Re: OT: [SAtalk] Only 1.3 score by spamassassin Jim Ford
• 2003/07/02 [SAtalk] Qmail-scanner and SA, scanning question Eric Schoeller
• 2003/07/02 Re: [SAtalk] Hormel sues Alan Leghart
• 2003/07/02 Re: [SAtalk] sa-learn question... Jim Ford
• 2003/07/02 Re: [SAtalk] Hormel sues Vivek Khera
• 2003/07/02 Re: [SAtalk] sa-learn question... Patrick Morris
• 2003/07/02 Re: RE: [SAtalk] Only 1.3 score by spamassassin Thomas Cameron
• 2003/07/02 Re: OT: [SAtalk] Only 1.3 score by spamassassin Kai Schaetzl
• 2003/07/02 Re: [SAtalk] sa-learn question... Wendell Smith
• 2003/07/02 [SAtalk] MAPS RBL+ problem spamassassin_faq
• 2003/07/02 [SAtalk] Virtual users + SQL Mark Lowes
• 2003/07/02 Re: OT: RE: [SAtalk] Only 1.3 score by spamassassin Bart Schaefer
• 2003/07/02 Re: [SAtalk] Hormel sues Malte S. Stretz
• 2003/07/02 [SAtalk] ANN: SpamPD v.2 released Max Paperno
• 2003/07/02 [SAtalk] Here's a good one SpamAssassin cought (Was: OPEN ME) Evan Platt
• 2003/07/02 [SAtalk] (no report template found) Ron Bombard
• 2003/07/02 Re: [SAtalk] Why did this spam go through? Ross Vandegrift
• 2003/07/02 [SAtalk] Hormel sues Liudvikas Bukys
• 2003/07/02 Re: [SAtalk] _REPORT_ format Theo Van Dinter
• 2003/07/02 RE: [SAtalk] _REPORT_ format Sean Cardus
• 2003/07/02 [SAtalk] 2.60 and Base 64 enc text? Chris Santerre
• 2003/07/02 Re: [SAtalk] _REPORT_ format Andrew A. Vasilyev
• 2003/07/02 Re: [SAtalk] _REPORT_ format Matt Kettler
• 2003/07/02 OT: RE: [SAtalk] Only 1.3 score by spamassassin Bill
• 2003/07/02 Re: [SAtalk] Only 1.3 score by spamassassin Hannu Liljemark
• 2003/07/02 Re: [SAtalk] Why did this spam go through? Hannu Liljemark
• 2003/07/02 [SAtalk] Procmail+Spamassassin on global domain basis David Jacobson
• 2003/07/02 Re: [SAtalk] spamd "simply replaces" spamassassin? d on't think so Hannu Liljemark
• 2003/07/02 Re: [SAtalk] Metrics / Statistics question Hannu Liljemark
• 2003/07/02 [SAtalk] _REPORT_ format Andrew A. Vasilyev
• 2003/07/02 [SAtalk] Only 1.3 score by spamassassin Jan Elmqvist Nielsen
• 2003/07/02 Re: [SAtalk] How could I know that Spamassassin is working in my system? Ralf Guenthner
• 2003/07/02 Re: [SAtalk] Running spamd supervised? Ralf Guenthner
• 2003/07/02 [SAtalk] Couple more links adivvy
• 2003/07/02 [SAtalk] New spammer technique Pierre Bacquet
• 2003/07/01 Re[2]: [SAtalk] meaning of rule descriptions Abigail Marshall
• 2003/07/01 [SAtalk] Houghton Internationals' Anti-virus Service, Antigen, found FILEFILTER= *.pif file ANTIGEN_VF_EXCHANGE01
• 2003/07/01 [SAtalk] Why did this spam go through? Abigail Marshall
• 2003/07/01 Re: [SAtalk] How to call SA in Sendmail? alan premselaar
• 2003/07/01 [SAtalk] Blocked File Attachment Mail Adminstrator
• 2003/07/01 Re: [SAtalk] meaning of rule descriptions Matt Kettler
• 2003/07/01 Re: [SAtalk] meaning of rule descriptions Jay Levitt
• 2003/07/01 [SAtalk] ScanMail Message: To Recipient virus found and action taken. System Attendant
• 2003/07/01 [SAtalk] Report to Recipient(s) LTREEUS2
• 2003/07/01 [SAtalk] Report to Recipient(s) LTREEUS2
• 2003/07/01 Re: [SAtalk] How could I know that Spamassassin is working in my system? lanceeck
• 2003/07/01 Re: [SAtalk] meaning of rule descriptions Abigail Marshall
• 2003/07/01 [SAtalk] RBL tests timing out Baron Fujimoto
• 2003/07/01 RE: [SAtalk] Troubleshooting IMAPAssassin, Mail::SpamAssassin, Check Msg always returns 0 point score SpamAssassin
• 2003/07/01 [SAtalk] Metrics / Statistics question Robert A Nesius
• 2003/07/01 Re: [SAtalk] How could I know that Spamassassin is working in my system? Puth Chan Choth
• 2003/07/01 Re: [SAtalk] meaning of rule descriptions Justin Mason
• 2003/07/01 RE: [SAtalk] Bug 1927 - spamd looping - v2.54 David Prall
• 2003/07/01 [SAtalk] meaning of rule descriptions Klaus Heinz
• 2003/07/01 Re: [SAtalk] Bug in whitelist_from? Matt Kettler
• 2003/07/01 Re: [SAtalk] Troubleshooting IMAPAssassin, Mail::SpamAssassin, Check Msg always returns 0 point score Justin Mason
• 2003/07/01 Re: [SAtalk] Milters, Solaris & Sendmail Patrick Morris
• 2003/07/01 [SAtalk] Troubleshooting IMAPAssassin, Mail::SpamAssassin, Check Msg always returns 0 point score SpamAssassin
• 2003/07/01 [SAtalk] Milters, Solaris & Sendmail Patrick Murphy
• 2003/07/01 Re: [SAtalk] Re: "Naughty" test names Robin Lynn Frank
• 2003/07/01 [SAtalk] Couple of interesting links adivvy
• 2003/07/01 RE: [SAtalk] dcc and rbl checks not working.... Steven Rocha
• 2003/07/01 Re: [SAtalk] How to call SA in Sendmail? Thomas Cameron
• 2003/07/01 Re: [SAtalk] How to call SA in Sendmail? Thomas Cameron
• 2003/07/01 Re: [SAtalk] dcc and rbl checks not working.... Theo Van Dinter
• 2003/07/01 Re: [SAtalk] Re: "Naughty" test names Martin Radford
• 2003/07/01 [SAtalk] dcc and rbl checks not working.... VonEssen, John
• 2003/07/01 [SAtalk] Re: "Naughty" test names Chris Barnes
• 2003/07/01 Re: [SAtalk] How to call SA in Sendmail? Patrick Morris
• 2003/07/01 Re: [SAtalk] Two new techniques or old hat? Kelson Vibber
• 2003/07/01 [SAtalk] FW: Postmaster notify: see transcript for details L. Walsh
• 2003/07/01 [SAtalk] sa-learn question... Wendell Smith
• 2003/07/01 RE: [SAtalk] How to call SA in Sendmail? Mark Emerle
• 2003/07/01 Re: [SAtalk] spamd "simply replaces" spamassassin? don't think so Martin Radford
• 2003/07/01 Re: [SAtalk] How to call SA in Sendmail? Thomas Cameron
• 2003/07/01 [SAtalk] spamd/spamc parameters Daniel Daley
• 2003/07/01 Re: [SAtalk] Moving Bayes Database. Mark Jenks
• 2003/07/01 Re: [SAtalk] How to call SA in Sendmail? Patrick Morris
• 2003/07/01 RE: [SAtalk] Running spamd supervised? Dallas L. Engelken
• 2003/07/01 Re: [SAtalk] How to call SA in Sendmail? Matt Kettler
• 2003/07/01 [SAtalk] Attachment headers in body, rawbody, or header? David Parr
• 2003/07/01 Re: [SAtalk] Spamassassin and qmail-scanner Joe Young
• 2003/07/01 Re: [SAtalk] Spamassassin and qmail-scanner Ralf Guenthner
• 2003/07/01 Re: [SAtalk] baeys config parameters? Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
• 2003/07/01 RE: [SAtalk] Spamassassin and qmail-scanner Dallas L. Engelken
• 2003/07/01 [SAtalk] How to call SA in Sendmail? Leo Huang
• 2003/07/01 Re: [SAtalk] Moving Bayes Database. Mark Jenks
• 2003/07/01 Re: AW: [SAtalk] best way for off-host users to submit to sa-learn? Gary Schrock
• 2003/07/01 RE: [SAtalk] spamd "simply replaces" spamassassin? don't think so Chris Santerre
• 2003/07/01 [SAtalk] Bayes Database. Marek Dohojda
• 2003/07/01 Re: [SAtalk] spamd "simply replaces" spamassassin? don't think so Jim Ford
• 2003/07/01 [SAtalk] Running spamd supervised? Ralf Guenthner
• 2003/07/01 RE: [SAtalk] spamd "simply replaces" spamassassin? don't think so McClung, Darren W.
• 2003/07/01 [SAtalk] Spamassassin and qmail-scanner Joe Young
• 2003/07/01 Re: [SAtalk] Default Scores of 0.001 Matt Kettler
• 2003/07/01 [SAtalk] Spamassassin and qmail-scanner Joe Young
• 2003/07/01 RE: [SAtalk] Bug 1927 - spamd looping - v2.54 Dallas L. Engelken
• 2003/07/01 [SAtalk] RFC - Blocking Based on Layout of HTML Fox Flanders
• 2003/07/01 [SAtalk] Bug 1927 - spamd looping - v2.54 Dallas L. Engelken
• 2003/07/01 Re: [SAtalk] Moving Bayes Database. Hannu Liljemark
• 2003/07/01 [SAtalk] spamd "simply replaces" spamassassin? don't think so Iago
• 2003/07/01 Re: [SAtalk] Moving Bayes Database. Mark Jenks
• 2003/07/01 Re: [SAtalk] BUGGY_CGI? Bob Apthorpe
• 2003/07/01 RE: [SAtalk] Intriguing header forgery Chris Santerre
• 2003/07/01 [SAtalk] re: Help in installation Jon Miller
• 2003/07/01 [SAtalk] Two new techniques or old hat? adivvy
• 2003/07/01 Re: [SAtalk] re: SA installation problem Bob Apthorpe
• 2003/07/01 Re: [SAtalk] Bug in whitelist_from? Adam T. Bowen
• 2003/07/01 RE: [SAtalk] Creative spam, any ideas? Chris Santerre
• 2003/07/01 Re: [SAtalk] Bug in whitelist_from? Matt Kettler
• 2003/07/01 RE: [SAtalk] BUGGY_CGI? Darren Shrubsole
• 2003/07/01 [SAtalk] Bug in whitelist_from? Adam T. Bowen
• 2003/07/01 Re: [SAtalk] baeys config parameters? Theo Van Dinter
• 2003/07/01 Re: [SAtalk] USER_AGENT_MOZILLA scores Theo Van Dinter
• 2003/07/01 RE: [SAtalk] baeys config parameters? Tom Meunier
• 2003/07/01 Re: [SAtalk] USER_AGENT_MOZILLA scores Kai Schaetzl
• 2003/07/01 Re: [SAtalk] "required hits" option t macek
• 2003/07/01 Re: [SAtalk] "required hits" option Hannu Liljemark
• 2003/07/01 [SAtalk] skip some ip's to be checked Muenz, Michael
• 2003/07/01 Re: [SAtalk] Moving Bayes Database. Hannu Liljemark
• 2003/07/01 RE: [SAtalk] Newbies? Thomas Kinghorn
• 2003/07/01 Re: [SAtalk] learning mailserver headers Kai Schaetzl
• 2003/07/01 [SAtalk] Procmail+Spamassassin Recipe David Jacobson
• 2003/07/01 RE: [SAtalk] best way for off-host users to submit to sa-learn? sietze
• 2003/07/01 Re: [SAtalk] Creative spam, any ideas? Ralf Guenthner
• 2003/07/01 [SAtalk] USER_AGENT_MOZILLA scores Dr. Juergen Klueners
• 2003/07/01 [SAtalk] Newbies? sietze
• 2003/07/01 AW: [SAtalk] best way for off-host users to submit to sa-learn? Martin Bene
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] Ideas on dealing with Joe Job? David Cary
• 2003/06/30 [SAtalk] "required hits" option t macek
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] learning mailserver headers Justin Mason
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] Intriguing header forgery Tony Earnshaw
• 2003/06/30 Fwd: Re: [SAtalk] learning mailserver headers Simon Byrnand
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] IMAP: Mark as read? Brian Klug
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] learning mailserver headers Simon Byrnand
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] learning mailserver headers Justin Mason
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] IMAP: Mark as read? Jim Cunning
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] best way for off-host users to submit to sa-learn? Chad Leigh -- Pengar Enterprises Inc
• 2003/06/30 [SAtalk] Am I screwing up my bayes database? Tom Diehl
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] best way for off-host users to submit to sa-learn? Robert Menschel
• 2003/06/30 [SAtalk] ANNOUNCE: mass-checks starting for 2.60 Justin Mason
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] Default Scores of 0.001 Daniel Quinlan
• 2003/06/30 [SAtalk] re: SA installation problem Jon Miller
• 2003/06/30 [SAtalk] learning mailserver headers Simon Byrnand
• 2003/06/30 [SAtalk] Data Format Error Leo Huang
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] best way for off-host users to submit to sa-learn? Leo Huang
• 2003/06/30 RE: [SAtalk] mrtg Peter P. Benac
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] why not use SA on this SA list? Alexander Litvinov
• 2003/06/30 [SAtalk] Default Scores of 0.001 R . W .
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] "Naughty" test names AltGrendel
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] mrtg Tim Litwiller
• 2003/06/30 RE: [SAtalk] mrtg Peter P. Benac
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] Creative spam, any ideas? Robert Menschel
• 2003/06/30 [SAtalk] Reloading SpamAssassin's Preferences? Daniel M. Zimmerman
• 2003/06/30 [SAtalk] best way for off-host users to submit to sa-learn? Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
• 2003/06/30 [SAtalk] mrtg Ronny Roethof
• 2003/06/30 [SAtalk] baeys config parameters? Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] HEADER: Delivered-To: Demitrious S. Kelly
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] "Naughty" test names Satya
• 2003/06/30 [SAtalk] IMAP: Mark as read? Brian Klug
• 2003/06/30 [SAtalk] Error message in /var/log/maillog confusion jwelk
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] How do I know whether Bayes is working or not? Morten Kjeldgaard
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] why not use SA on this SA list? Steve Thomas
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] Getting a full report on uncaught spam Jim Ford
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] why not use SA on this SA list? Benjamin A. Shelton
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] HEADER: Delivered-To: Theo Van Dinter
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] Moving Bayes Database. Mark Jenks
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] HEADER: Delivered-To: Demitrious S. Kelly
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] Conflicting scores in SA/MailScanner Theo Van Dinter
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] Conflicting scores in SA/MailScanner Greg Cirino
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] why not use SA on this SA list? Alan Leghart
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] Conflicting scores in SA/MailScanner Martin Radford
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] Getting a full report on uncaught spam Theo Van Dinter
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] why not use SA on this SA list? Martin Radford
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] Getting a full report on uncaught spam Matt Kettler
• 2003/06/30 [SAtalk] Intriguing header forgery Martin Radford
• 2003/06/30 [SAtalk] Re: "Naughty" test names Dan Jacobson
• 2003/06/30 [SAtalk] why not use SA on this SA list? Dan Jacobson
• 2003/06/30 [SAtalk] Getting a full report on uncaught spam Mike Mills
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] HEADER: Delivered-To: Theo Van Dinter
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] Conflicting scores in SA/MailScanner Greg Cirino
• 2003/06/30 [SAtalk] HEADER: Delivered-To: Demitrious S. Kelly
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] Conflicting scores in SA/MailScanner Nix
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] A question or two... Theo Van Dinter
• 2003/06/30 Re: [SAtalk] Sitewide config Theo Van Dinter
• 2003/06/30 [SAtalk] Sitewide config Richard Humphrey

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]