At Mon Jun 30 16:41:56 2003, Bob Apthorpe wrote: > IIRC, rule names are arbitrary[1] and apparently a global > search-and-replace fixes this problem for those sites that see it as a > problem. It should be easy but tedious to (eventually) change the code > to use optional less vivid rule names. Probably better to build a script > that automates the search-and-replace, test it as part of release, and > toss it in /contrib. A further stopgap - build a sanitized translation > file (/usr/share/spamassassin/30_text_??.cf) and mangle the report to > show the user only the sanitized rule descriptions, not the rule names.
Alternatively, just have a config setting that mangles the rule name (perhaps by applying rot13 - so it can be decoded easily if required), and display a sanitised description as suggested above. My feeling is that this wouldn't be too difficult to implement. However, I don't believe that the existing developers should consider this a priority. But if someone actually put in the work to implement this, I'd hope the developers would consider including it. CRAVF_RAYNETR2 Information on enlarging body parts Martin -- Martin Radford | "Only wimps use tape backup: _real_ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | men just upload their important stuff -o) Registered Linux user #9257 | on ftp and let the rest of the world /\\ - see http://counter.li.org | mirror it ;)" - Linus Torvalds _\_V ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100006ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/01 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
