Has anyone else noticed that SA tags AOL bounce messages as spam? Which I also find to be incorrect because messages should be rejected when the MTA attempts to establish a connection, not after the message is delivered.
Would this not rather depend on exactly how you have your MTA configured?
Like all messages received are first handled by the MTA?
Granted my only experience is with Exim 4, SA-Exim 3 (no, not Exim 3.x) and Postfix 2.0. But all of them can be configured to handle bounce messages before they even get to SA.
Best,
Tony
-- Tony Earnshaw
No nudes is bad nudes
http://j-walk.com/blog/docs/conference.htm http://www.billy.demon.nl Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100006ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/01 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
