On Fri, 2003-06-27 at 21:39, Rick Beebe wrote: > I'd like to appeal to the SA collective to change the name of the > PENIS_ENLARGE tests to something a little more innocuous. Apparently > some people find it offensive to see it in their email.
So how do they feel about rules called EJACULATION, CUM_SHOT, RAPE ? If that's what the rule matches, that's what the rule should be called, otherwise we're constantly looking up what some cryptic rule name is for. Ask them if it's more offensive than the actual spam, offer to disable all rules with offensive or politically-incorrect names for them any time they like. What are you, a bofh or a mouse? :) I had one similar complaint when a message full of management-speak triggered the RICH rule for one of my commercial clients. The description for the rule is "if only it were that easy" and the MD took a while to see the funny side of having his speech criticised by a mailserver. More to the point, the name and description of the rule were sufficiently counter-intuitive that I had to look it up to see what it was supposed to be. Had it been described something like "make you rich quick" it would've been helpful. Seriously though, the rule names and descriptions are a little informal in places. I've seen some effort go into tidying up some rule names for 2.60, it would be nice to see them all with "management-safe" descriptions as well. -- Yorkshire Dave ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100006ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/01 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
