Well Ralf, I think this has been discussed before, about 4 months ago, and the most consensuated sollution was to do some sa-learn of that messages. The OBFUSCATING_COMMENT rule isn't working pretty well, so most of us are teaching Bayes to recognize this kind of messages. There's practically nothing you can do about letter substitutions, unless you manage perl regexp, but you'd have to create so many rules that you'd reinventing the wheel (or SA!). So, my two cents go to Bayes and sa-learn

Regards,

                   Luis Hernán Otegui
                 Administrador de Red
            Facultad de Ciencias Exactas
                             UNLP
----------------------------------------------------
GNU-GPL: "May The Source Be With You..."
----------------------------------------------------




From: "Ralf Guenthner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Ralf Guenthner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Luis Hernán Otegui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Quick question
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 18:02:57 +0200

Hi Luis

You may remember me, we spoke briefly about clever cats last week <s>
Did you see my posting about the obfuscated porn spam substituting letters?
Did I miss something obvious, has it been discussed before? Nobody replied
as of yet...

Cheers
Ralf


_________________________________________________________________
Charla con tus amigos en línea mediante MSN Messenger: http://messenger.yupimsn.com/




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100006ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/01
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to