Adam Lopresto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Somehow that seems really complex.
I don't think my proposal would be very hard to implement. But I have not verified this. > Perhaps there could be an option not to display the rule names at > all, just the descriptions, which can easily be overridden in > local.cf. Think about the current content analysis format: Content analysis details: (12.10 points, 5 required) MY_RULE_14 (3.2 points) X-Mailer: indicates spam MUA REMOVE_PAGE (0.3 points) URI: URL of page called "remove" [...] If you dropped the rule names, tuning the scores would require more effort than today. The rule name is a unique key, the description does not have to be unique, and thus figuring out which rule fired could be catchy. -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Yours sincerely Dipl. Inform. Ralph Seichter HORUS-IT Ahornweg 10 D-57635 Oberirsen Tel +49 2686 987880 Fax +49 2686 987889 http://horus-it.de/ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100006ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/01 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
