Robin Lynn Frank wrote on Fri, 27 Jun 2003 19:25:20 -0700: > Why does everyone always have to get so combative. If changing the rule names > a little to avoid offending the easily offended, it does no harm. It is the > same rule after all. What it is called is of no real consequence. >
You are right and you are not right. One shouldn't be combative about this. But: penis is not an offensive word at all, you find it in every dictionary and in the Encyclopedia Brittanica. If you go that root you also have to change the names of rules which contain "sex", "porn" etc. in the name. I personally would definitely NOT know what the BIGGER_BITS rule means (as a non-native speaker it's not in my active vocabulary, I would know what it means in a full sentence, but I would scratch my head if I saw "BIGGER_BITS" on its own) until I look up the description, now imagine with what creative names you need to come up to name all these other rules. In the end you completely loose any tie between the name and the rule and this is definitely not a good thing. Furthermore, I don't understand why these people get upset at all. They can shut off the body reporting and won't see the rule names or simply get excluded from spam tagging which will give them a flood of "pen1s" and "p0rn" mails. Is this any better? Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com IE-Center: http://ie5.de & http://msie.winware.org ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100006ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/01 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
