On Friday 27 June 2003 06:07 pm, Satya wrote:
> On Jun 27, 2003 at 15:41, Ernest W. Lessenger wrote:
> >reasonable to avoid using "offensive" labels, if only to avoid getting
> >yelled at by "little old ladies" (closely related to the "overworked
> >mother" and the "drill sergeant with two 8yr old children who just saw the
> >word 'penis" in an email") with too much time on their hands. They are a
> >small but vocal minority :)
>
> Good, then they can be vocal and complain about spam itself, instead
> of anti-spam measures.
Why does everyone always have to get so combative. If changing the rule names
a little to avoid offending the easily offended, it does no harm. It is the
same rule after all. What it is called is of no real consequence.
--
Robin Lynn Frank
Director of Operations
Paradigm-Omega, LLC
******
The need to do something is
inversely proportional to the
time available.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100006ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/01
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
