spamassassin-talk  

Messages by Date

• 2002/06/01 Re: [SAtalk] AWL adjustment flags SA-talk email as spam Craig R Hughes
• 2002/06/01 Re: [SAtalk] large numbers of tiny scores = SPAM! Craig R Hughes
• 2002/06/01 Re: [SAtalk] Score isn't overridded Craig R Hughes
• 2002/06/01 Re: [SAtalk] large numbers of tiny scores = SPAM! Craig R Hughes
• 2002/06/01 Re: 65.9 (was "Re: ** 30.50/04.50 ** [SAtalk] New describe in Frenchand a new version of the tool that extracts lateste rules") Craig R Hughes
• 2002/06/01 Re: [SAtalk] Wish list? dynamic required_hits Craig R Hughes
• 2002/06/01 Re: ** 30.50/04.50 ** [SAtalk] New describe in French and a newversion of the tool that extracts lateste rules Craig R Hughes
• 2002/06/01 Re: [SAtalk] Why aren't ALL scores genetically evolved? Craig R Hughes
• 2002/06/01 Re: [SAtalk] testing five-card charlie Michael C. Berch
• 2002/06/01 Re: [SAtalk] Oops! Craig R Hughes
• 2002/06/01 Re: [SAtalk] bug: spamd does not honour -s flag Craig R Hughes
• 2002/06/01 RE: [SAtalk] Re: DCC and razor doc (Was: Why aren't ALL scoresgeneticallyevolved?) Craig R Hughes
• 2002/06/01 Re: [SAtalk] large auto-whitelist.db problems? Craig R Hughes
• 2002/06/01 Re: [SAtalk] large numbers of tiny scores = SPAM! Craig R Hughes
• 2002/06/01 Re: [SAtalk] blacklist available a completely separate module? Craig R Hughes
• 2002/06/01 Re: [SAtalk] handing SA to cyrus Craig R Hughes
• 2002/06/01 Re: [SAtalk] What is legal format for whitelist_from Craig R Hughes
• 2002/06/01 [SAtalk] Re: spamproxyd problems (from sa-dev) + discussion on daemonization xavier renaut
• 2002/06/01 Re: [SAtalk] What is legal format for whitelist_from Craig R Hughes
• 2002/06/01 Re: [SAtalk] large numbers of tiny scores = SPAM! Craig R Hughes
• 2002/06/01 Re: [SAtalk] scoring individual words Craig R Hughes
• 2002/06/01 RE: [SAtalk] An amusing spamfooter Larry Rosenman
• 2002/06/01 Re: [SAtalk] An amusing spamfooter Duncan Findlay
• 2002/06/01 Re: [SAtalk] Options to automate updating rulebase? Craig R Hughes
• 2002/06/01 RE: [SAtalk] An amusing spamfooter Michael Moncur
• 2002/06/01 Re: [SAtalk] What is legal format for whitelist_from Craig R Hughes
• 2002/06/01 Re: [SAtalk] spamd won't start Craig R Hughes
• 2002/06/01 Re: [SAtalk] Updating Mail Rules Craig R Hughes
• 2002/06/01 Re: [SAtalk] charsets question Craig R Hughes
• 2002/06/01 Re: [SAtalk] A pointer for nailing Korean based spam Craig R Hughes
• 2002/06/01 Re: [SAtalk] Options to automate updating rulebase? Craig R Hughes
• 2002/06/01 RE: [SAtalk] An amusing spamfooter Bart Schaefer
• 2002/06/01 [SAtalk] spamd proxy + Postfix Sweethome.co.il Webmaster
• 2002/06/01 RE: [SAtalk] An amusing spamfooter Daniel Quinlan
• 2002/06/01 RE: [SAtalk] An amusing spamfooter Nathan Neulinger
• 2002/06/01 Re: [SAtalk] the war of autoreplies (why whitelists break down) andneeded change of SA Tony L. Svanstrom
• 2002/06/01 RE: [SAtalk] An amusing spamfooter Michael Moncur
• 2002/05/31 RE: [SAtalk] An amusing spamfooter Daniel Quinlan
• 2002/05/31 RE: [SAtalk] An amusing spamfooter Michael Moncur
• 2002/05/31 Re: [SAtalk] the war of autoreplies (why whitelists break down) and needed change of SA dman
• 2002/05/31 RE: [SAtalk] An amusing spamfooter Michael Moncur
• 2002/05/31 Re: [SAtalk] Too few clues in debug messages Harry Putnam
• 2002/05/31 Re: [SAtalk] An amusing spamfooter Daniel Quinlan
• 2002/05/31 Re: [SAtalk] Strange Headers... Rick Macdougall
• 2002/05/31 Re: [SAtalk] Strange Headers... Daniel Quinlan
• 2002/05/31 Re: [SAtalk] RPM install failed (was: Newbie installation question) Michael Stenner
• 2002/05/31 Re: [SAtalk] Strange Headers... Bart Schaefer
• 2002/05/31 Re: [SAtalk] Strange Headers... Daniel Quinlan
• 2002/05/31 [SAtalk] An amusing spamfooter Jason Baker
• 2002/05/31 Re: [SAtalk] Strange Headers... Michael C. Berch
• 2002/05/31 Re: [SAtalk] Strange Headers... Sidney Markowitz
• 2002/05/31 Re: [SAtalk] RPM install failed (was: Newbie installation question) Randy Cassingham
• 2002/05/31 [SAtalk] Strange Headers... Brian May
• 2002/05/31 Re: [SAtalk] Too few clues in debug messages Harry Putnam
• 2002/05/31 Re: [SAtalk] X-Mailer: Atlas Mailer 2.0 is spam mailer? Ken Causey
• 2002/05/31 Re: [SAtalk] X-Mailer: Atlas Mailer 2.0 is spam mailer? Michael C. Berch
• 2002/05/31 [SAtalk] auto-whitelists Pete Hanson
• 2002/05/31 [SAtalk] network test performance Daniel Quinlan
• 2002/05/31 [SAtalk] New tactic?? Andrew Kohlsmith
• 2002/05/31 [SAtalk] newbie: scoring FSCK Mark E Crane
• 2002/05/31 [SAtalk] Autowhite list... Brian May
• 2002/05/31 Re: [SAtalk] Too few clues in debug messages John Horne
• 2002/05/31 [SAtalk] enable / disable setting ... Marc G. Fournier
• 2002/05/31 Re: [SAtalk] Too few clues in debug messages Harry Putnam
• 2002/05/31 [SAtalk] X-Mailer: Atlas Mailer 2.0 is spam mailer? Ken Causey
• 2002/05/31 Re: [SAtalk] the war of autoreplies (why whitelists break down) andneeded change of SA Tony L. Svanstrom
• 2002/05/31 [SAtalk] Where's the Blacklist? Jim Hale
• 2002/05/31 Re: [SAtalk] Where is the best place to search the archives on thislist? Matt Sergeant
• 2002/05/31 Re: [SAtalk] large numbers of tiny scores = SPAM! Matt Sergeant
• 2002/05/31 Re: [SAtalk] Too few clues in debug messages John Horne
• 2002/05/31 [SAtalk] Too few clues in debug messages Harry Putnam
• 2002/05/31 Re: [SAtalk] AWL adjustment flags SA-talk email as spam Olivier Nicole
• 2002/05/31 Re: [SAtalk] patch: overhauled RBL query and result gathering code Marc MERLIN
• 2002/05/30 Re: [SAtalk] New user question regarding razor. Lars Hansson
• 2002/05/30 [SAtalk] AWL adjustment flags SA-talk email as spam Kingsley G. Morse Jr.
• 2002/05/30 Re: [SAtalk] spamass-milter, spamc/d, per-user prefs Olivier Nicole
• 2002/05/30 Re: [SAtalk] OutLook Express 3.14159 rODbegbie
• 2002/05/30 Re: ** 30.50/04.50 ** [SAtalk] New describe in French and a newversion of the tool that extracts lateste rules Olivier Nicole
• 2002/05/30 Re: [SAtalk] the war of autoreplies (why whitelists break down) andneeded change of SA Sean Rima
• 2002/05/30 Re: [SAtalk] Suggested 60_whitelist.cf addition Michael Stauber
• 2002/05/30 Re: [SAtalk] large numbers of tiny scores = SPAM! Duncan Findlay
• 2002/05/30 Re: [SAtalk] Suggested 60_whitelist.cf addition Duncan Findlay
• 2002/05/30 Re: [SAtalk] Why aren't ALL scores genetically evolved? Duncan Findlay
• 2002/05/30 Re: [SAtalk] Wish list? dynamic required_hits Simon Lyall
• 2002/05/30 Re: [SAtalk] OutLook Express 3.14159 Brian May
• 2002/05/30 RE: [SAtalk] Postfix spamproxyd Jeremy Fowler
• 2002/05/30 [SAtalk] OutLook Express 3.14159 Patrice Fournier
• 2002/05/30 Re: [SAtalk] Misplaced Received headers and Message-Id Bart Schaefer
• 2002/05/30 Re: [SAtalk] the war of autoreplies (why whitelists break down) and needed change of SA dman
• 2002/05/30 Re: [SAtalk] Misplaced Received headers and Message-Id dman
• 2002/05/30 [SAtalk] testing five-card charlie Daniel Quinlan
• 2002/05/30 Re: 65.9 (was "Re: ** 30.50/04.50 ** [SAtalk] New describe in French and a new version of the tool that extracts lateste rules") Daniel Quinlan
• 2002/05/30 Re: [SAtalk] Score isn't overridded Harry Putnam
• 2002/05/30 Re: [SAtalk] Where is the best place to search the archives on this list? Ed Kasky
• 2002/05/30 Re: [SAtalk] Score isn't overridded Harry Putnam
• 2002/05/30 Re: [SAtalk] Where is the best place to search the archives on this list? Graham Dunn
• 2002/05/30 [SAtalk] Where is the best place to search the archives on this list? Jeremy Fowler
• 2002/05/30 [SAtalk] Re: Malformed From Header Nevin Kapur
• 2002/05/30 Re: [SAtalk] Score isn't overridded Theo Van Dinter
• 2002/05/30 [SAtalk] Score isn't overridded Harry Putnam
• 2002/05/30 Re: [SAtalk] large numbers of tiny scores = SPAM! Michael C. Berch
• 2002/05/30 Re: [SAtalk] Why aren't ALL scores genetically evolved? Kingsley G. Morse Jr.
• 2002/05/30 Re: [SAtalk] spamass-milter - what's the point? Keith Whyte
• 2002/05/30 Re: [SAtalk] large numbers of tiny scores = SPAM! Kingsley G. Morse Jr.
• 2002/05/30 RE: [SAtalk] Malformed From Header Bart Schaefer
• 2002/05/30 [SAtalk] spamass-milter, spamc/d, per-user prefs Neulinger, Nathan
• 2002/05/30 RE: [SAtalk] Malformed From Header Don Van Ausdoll
• 2002/05/30 [SAtalk] Postfix spamproxyd Jeremy Fowler
• 2002/05/30 Re: [SAtalk] the war of autoreplies (why whitelists break down) and needed change of SA Jason Baker
• 2002/05/30 Re: [SAtalk] spamass-milter - what's the point? Keith Whyte
• 2002/05/30 [SAtalk] Misplaced Received headers and Message-Id Bart Schaefer
• 2002/05/30 Re: Removing rules with negative score? (Was: Re: [SAtalk] WEB_BUGStests a negative?) Matt Sergeant
• 2002/05/30 Re: [SAtalk] Malformed From Header Bart Schaefer
• 2002/05/30 65.9 (was "Re: ** 30.50/04.50 ** [SAtalk] New describe in French and a new version of the tool that extracts lateste rules") David T-G
• 2002/05/30 Re: [SAtalk] the war of autoreplies (why whitelists break down) and needed changeof SA Vivek Khera
• 2002/05/30 Re: [SAtalk] Wish list? dynamic required_hits Matt Sergeant
• 2002/05/30 Re: Removing rules with negative score? (Was: Re: [SAtalk] WEB_BUGStests a negative?) Tony L. Svanstrom
• 2002/05/30 Re: [SAtalk] Malformed From Header dman
• 2002/05/30 Re: [SAtalk] the war of autoreplies (why whitelists break down) and needed change of SA dman
• 2002/05/30 Re: ** 30.50/04.50 ** [SAtalk] New describe in French and a new version of the tool that extracts lateste rules dman
• 2002/05/30 [SAtalk] Malformed From Header Don Van Ausdoll
• 2002/05/30 Re: [SAtalk] A pointer for nailing Korean based spam dman
• 2002/05/30 Re: [SAtalk] Why aren't ALL scores genetically evolved? Vivek Khera
• 2002/05/30 Re: [SAtalk] Wish list? dynamic required_hits John Horne
• 2002/05/30 Re: [SAtalk] the war of autoreplies (why whitelists break down) andneeded change of SA Tony L. Svanstrom
• 2002/05/30 Re: Removing rules with negative score? (Was: Re: [SAtalk] WEB_BUGS tests a negative?) Vivek Khera
• 2002/05/30 [SAtalk] spamd error/warning Jeroen Valcke
• 2002/05/30 Re: [SAtalk] the war of autoreplies (why whitelists break down) and needed change of SA Theo Van Dinter
• 2002/05/30 [SAtalk] Wish list? dynamic required_hits John Horne
• 2002/05/30 [SAtalk] [Fwd: IP: SIMSON SAYS: An End to Spam With SpamAssassin] Rob McMillin
• 2002/05/30 [SAtalk] Output of spamd -d -D -L -S Harry Putnam
• 2002/05/30 Re: [SAtalk] the war of autoreplies (why whitelists break down) andneeded change of SA Tony L. Svanstrom
• 2002/05/30 Re: [SAtalk] bug: spamd does not honour -s flag Lars Hansson
• 2002/05/30 Re: [SAtalk] Newbie installation woes Bryan Hoover
• 2002/05/30 Re: [SAtalk] the war of autoreplies (why whitelists break down) andneeded change of SA Matt Sergeant
• 2002/05/30 Re: [SAtalk] Newbie installation woes Matt Sergeant
• 2002/05/30 Re: [SAtalk] SA config based on recipient domain (spamd/spamc) Mark Lowes
• 2002/05/30 [SAtalk] the war of autoreplies (why whitelists break down) and needed changeof SA Tony L. Svanstrom
• 2002/05/30 [SAtalk] Newbie installation woes Lucian Wischik
• 2002/05/30 Re: [SAtalk] Why aren't ALL scores genetically evolved? Skip Montanaro
• 2002/05/30 Re: ** 30.50/04.50 ** [SAtalk] New describe in French and a newversion of the tool that extracts lateste rules Tony L. Svanstrom
• 2002/05/30 [SAtalk] New describe in French and a new version of the tool that extracts lateste rules Olivier Nicole
• 2002/05/30 [SAtalk] Oops! Olivier Nicole
• 2002/05/30 Re: [SAtalk] blacklist available a completely separate module? Matt Sergeant
• 2002/05/30 Re: [SAtalk] large numbers of tiny scores = SPAM! Matt Sergeant
• 2002/05/30 Re: [SAtalk] Simson talks about Spam Assassin Matt Sergeant
• 2002/05/30 Re: [SAtalk] A pointer for nailing Korean based spam Matt Sergeant
• 2002/05/30 [SAtalk] bug: spamd does not honour -s flag Steven Núñez
• 2002/05/29 RE: [SAtalk] large numbers of tiny scores = SPAM! Michael Moncur
• 2002/05/29 Re: [SAtalk] large numbers of tiny scores = SPAM! Michael C. Berch
• 2002/05/29 Re: [SAtalk] Re: DCC and razor doc (Was: Why aren't ALL scores geneticallyevolved?) rODbegbie
• 2002/05/29 RE: [SAtalk] Suggested 60_whitelist.cf addition Dan Kohn
• 2002/05/29 RE: [SAtalk] Re: DCC and razor doc (Was: Why aren't ALL scores geneticallyevolved?) Dan Kohn
• 2002/05/29 [SAtalk] A little present for the lists patience Harry Putnam
• 2002/05/29 Re: [SAtalk] Why aren't ALL scores genetically evolved? Kingsley G. Morse Jr.
• 2002/05/29 [SAtalk] large auto-whitelist.db problems? Rob Mangiafico
• 2002/05/29 [SAtalk] SQL and Spamc confusion JD
• 2002/05/29 [SAtalk] SA Memory Usage Bryan Hoover
• 2002/05/29 Re: Removing rules with negative score? (Was: Re: [SAtalk] WEB_BUGS tests a negative?) Duncan Findlay
• 2002/05/29 Re: [SAtalk] Rule based on Epoch Date? Duncan Findlay
• 2002/05/29 [SAtalk] Re: DCC and razor doc (Was: Why aren't ALL scores geneticallyevolved?) Craig R Hughes
• 2002/05/29 Re: [SAtalk] Why aren't ALL scores genetically evolved? Craig R Hughes
• 2002/05/29 Re: [SAtalk] Why aren't ALL scores genetically evolved? Craig R Hughes
• 2002/05/29 Re: [SAtalk] Simson talks about Spam Assassin Craig R Hughes
• 2002/05/29 Re: [SAtalk] patch: overhauled RBL query and result gathering code Craig R Hughes
• 2002/05/29 Re: [SAtalk] blacklist available a completely separate module? Kevin Layer
• 2002/05/29 [SAtalk] Suggested 60_whitelist.cf addition Michael Stauber
• 2002/05/29 RE: [SAtalk] Bad numbering in this version Craig R Hughes
• 2002/05/29 Re: [SAtalk] Bad numbering in this version Craig R Hughes
• 2002/05/29 Re: [SAtalk] URI rule with = doesn't work? Ben Jackson
• 2002/05/29 Re: [SAtalk] large numbers of tiny scores = SPAM! rODbegbie
• 2002/05/29 [SAtalk] Re: SpamAssassin + Postfix Daniel Pittman
• 2002/05/29 Re: [SAtalk] URI rule with = doesn't work? Craig R Hughes
• 2002/05/29 Re: [SAtalk] blacklist available a completely separate module? Daniel Quinlan
• 2002/05/29 Re: [SAtalk] large numbers of tiny scores = SPAM! Nathan Neulinger
• 2002/05/29 RE: [SAtalk] RE: Postfix + SpamAssassin site-wide Max Paperno
• 2002/05/29 [SAtalk] blacklist available a completely separate module? Kevin Layer
• 2002/05/29 RE: [SAtalk] RE: Postfix + SpamAssassin site-wide Greg Blakely
• 2002/05/29 Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin - some general info dman
• 2002/05/29 Re: [SAtalk] botched MIME tests? Craig R Hughes
• 2002/05/29 Re: [SAtalk] large numbers of tiny scores = SPAM! Rob Winters
• 2002/05/29 [SAtalk] RE: Postfix + SpamAssassin site-wide Dan . Smart
• 2002/05/29 [SAtalk] SpamAssassin - some general info Hugo
• 2002/05/29 Re: [SAtalk] large numbers of tiny scores = SPAM! Kingsley G. Morse Jr.
• 2002/05/29 Re: [SAtalk] large numbers of tiny scores = SPAM! Brian May
• 2002/05/29 Re: [SAtalk] large numbers of tiny scores = SPAM! dman
• 2002/05/29 Re: [SAtalk] handing SA to cyrus dman
• 2002/05/29 Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin + Postfix Vivek Khera
• 2002/05/29 Re: [SAtalk] large numbers of tiny scores = SPAM! Tony L. Svanstrom
• 2002/05/29 Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin + Postfix Mark Martinec
• 2002/05/29 Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin + Postfix Paul Bauer
• 2002/05/29 Re: [SAtalk] Is this normal? Harry Putnam
• 2002/05/29 Re: [SAtalk] large numbers of tiny scores = SPAM! Kingsley G. Morse Jr.
• 2002/05/29 Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin + Postfix Harry Putnam
• 2002/05/29 [SAtalk] handing SA to cyrus Paul Bauer
• 2002/05/29 Re: [SAtalk] A pointer for nailing Korean based spam dman
• 2002/05/29 Re: [SAtalk] Is this normal? dman
• 2002/05/29 Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin + Postfix Vivek Khera
• 2002/05/29 Re: [SAtalk] What is legal format for whitelist_from dman
• 2002/05/29 [SAtalk] SpamAssassin + Postfix Security

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]