I was surprised to see that the "AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment" rule added 31.1 (thirty-one point one!) to the score of the following email from this very list server.
That was easily enough to mis-flag it as spam. <sigh> I'd appreciate it if someone would explain how an AWL adjustment is supposed to work, and ideally how to reign it in. Thanks, Kingsley On Fri:07:50, Olivier Nicole wrote: > SPAM: -------------------- Start SpamAssassin results ---------------------- > SPAM: This mail is probably spam. The original message has been altered > SPAM: so you can recognise or block similar unwanted mail in future. > SPAM: See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. > SPAM: > SPAM: Content analysis details: (20.7 hits, 5 required) > SPAM: Hit! (-4.4 points) 'In-Reply-To' line found > SPAM: Hit! (-6.0 points) User is listed in 'whitelist_to' > SPAM: Hit! (31.1 points) AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment > SPAM: > SPAM: -------------------- End of SpamAssassin results --------------------- > > > Hmmm... just had to ask... what score did this get by the latest and greatest > >version of SA? > > Well for some reason, SA list is never checked by SA here. > > But I remember that the previous post (at time of 2.01 ?) got some 58 > points or something. > > Olivier > > _______________________________________________________________ > > Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference > August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm > > _______________________________________________ > Spamassassin-talk mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk -- _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
