Duncan Findlay wrote: > On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 10:01:27AM +0100, Matt Sergeant wrote: > > Clearly, we can not do this with EVERY combination, unless Craig has a > lot of CPU to spare. There are just under 400 rules right now. If we > ended up with 400 tests, there would be 79800 doubles and 10586800 > triplets. > > So, assuming the GA runs in O(n) time, (which is not at all likely to > be true -- I'd guess O(n^2) if I had to), this would require 26668 > times longer to generate scores. > > Of course this total would be less but still quite significant if > doubles and triples were added as they were seen, but still, I > estimate this would be extremely taxing on CPU.
My guess would be that the n there though is the number of messages, not the number of rules. Maybe I'm wrong though. Matt. _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
