Good point. Combinations of some rules may be more indicative of spam than others.
It would be great if the GA could infer the boolean logic, as well as the scores. Thanks, Kingsley On Wed:20:45, Tony L. Svanstrom wrote: > On Wed, 29 May 2002 the voices made Kingsley G. Morse Jr. write: > > > On Wed:11:43, Rob Winters wrote: > > [...] > > > SA does not give any credit to the cumulative effect > > [...] > > > > It seems to me that properly weighted scores would > > avoid this problem. I'd like to think that a good > > optimization algorithm, such as a genetic algorithm, > > could do the job. > > I don't agree with that; having rule A with rule B, C and D isn't the same as > having rule A and D... A and D could possibly be a harmless result, while A and > anything else could require a diffdrent score for rule A. > > > /Tony > -- > # Per scientiam ad libertatem! // Through knowledge towards freedom! # > # Genom kunskap mot frihet! =*= (c) 1999-2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] =*= # > -- Random URL (6/8): > <URL: http://www.macslash.org/ > When http://apple.slashdot.org/ isn't enough. -- _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
