Ah shoot, and I thought maybe I'd found something to do about those itty bitty spams with little text content. Thank you very much for spending the time to research this, you probably have just saved me from a round of complaints from users.
Ken On Fri, 2002-05-31 at 15:17, Michael C. Berch wrote: > On Friday, May 31, 2002, at 07:20 AM, Ken Causey wrote: > > In my daily missed spam harvesting I'm noticing this X-Mailer header: > > > > X-Mailer: Atlas Mailer 2.0 > > > > occassionally. Can anyone confirm or deny that this is a spam oriented > > mailer? Until I hear otherwise I believe I'll stick in a rule for it. > > Atlas Mailer does not appear to be a spam mailer. I searched for it in > my recent > mail archive (12000+ messages since mid-April), and got 133 instances of > its > use. Of those, 13 were spam, and 120 were non-spam. I can't find a > reference to > the product, but from brief analysis, all the users who sent mail using > it were from > AOL, netscape.net, or altavista.com, and I suspect it might be the back > end of > a webmail package. > > -- > Michael C. Berch > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
