dman wrote: d> The other bug is in SA. IIRC it only properly parses d> [real-name] <[address]> d> addresses and not d> [address] ([real name]) d> d> If I'm right on that, then you can't whitelist an address of that d> format. I may be wrong, though, and SA might handle that format d> correctly now.
I think you're wrong -- SA now parses addresses more or less according to the RFCs. Certainly the two format you listed are covered, but the whitelist mechanism is trying to match the address part, not the real name. C _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
