On Thu:10:01, Matt Sergeant wrote: > Kingsley G. Morse Jr. wrote: > > Good point. Combinations of some rules may be more > > indicative of spam than others. > > > > It would be great if the GA could infer the boolean > > logic, as well as the scores. > > It's possible that you could group the rules that matched, and feed it > into the score generating system (whatever that may be - I'm looking to > get rid of using the GA's here as it's just too slow to work with). [...]
Thanks for the update. You wrote that the GA is too slow. If the problem is that the GA _learns_ too slowly, you may want to check out the Fletcher-Reeves non-linear optimization (FRNLO) algorithm. I expect it would be considerably faster. It tends to follow trends faster than GAs, which take a while to weed out inferior solutions. If you wanted to get really fancy, you could relegate the GA to combining various rules and use FRNLO to optimize the scores. Thanks, Kingsley _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
