On Fri, 31 May 2002 the voices made Sean Rima write:
> Strnagely enough I got a spam a couple of days ago that had headers and
> body text from SA 2.20 but as I use CVS and my ISP doesn't use SA and
> the remote server connected direct to my ISPs box.
>
> It looked like a clever attempt to cover up spam :) Still failed as it
> went into my autoreport account :)
I don't really see what's so "clever" about it, because I don't see why anyone
would set up SA locally so that it blindly accept any SA-header like that...
you might call it a bug, but here the best one could hope for is to /dev/null
their e-mail by doing that.
/Tony
PS yes, my autoreply-thing does avoid getting caught in a mailloop; unless the
one in the other end's done something really weird I'm safe, and I'm working on
dealing with weirdness too.
--
# Per scientiam ad libertatem! // Through knowledge towards freedom! #
# Genom kunskap mot frihet! =*= (c) 1999-2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] =*= #
-- Random epigram: (8/9)
"I'm sorry, but after reading this thread, I'm having a hard time
coming up with an explanation for this nonsense which doesn't involve
you being a dumbass."
-- Bill Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
_______________________________________________________________
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
