On Sat, 1 Jun 2002 the voices made dman write:
> On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 03:11:48PM +0200, Tony L. Svanstrom wrote:
> | I don't really see what's so "clever" about it,
>
> Here's the clever part :
>
> ------
> X-Spam-Status: No <...>
>
> <a real spam message>
> ------
>
> If your site looks for the X-Spam-Status header to decide whether or
> not to run the message through SA, it would be fooled and would NOT be
> run through SA. (that's the not-so-clever part -- the bad setup on
> your side. Moral is: don't do that!)
Like I said, I don't see what's so clever about it... you'd have to be pretty
stupid if you accept any ol' header from any source; AND you have to set aside
the advice in the manuals and come up with your own solution that allow it.
On the "clientside" there's an intentionally broken spamcatcher, and on the
spammerside there's a clear sign of intent to force the message upon people; if
you're asking me the spammer is just doing his best to hurt himself.
/Tony
--
# Per scientiam ad libertatem! // Through knowledge towards freedom! #
# Genom kunskap mot frihet! =*= (c) 1999-2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] =*= #
-- Random URL (2/8):
<URL: http://www.apple.com/powerbook/ > *BSD, on the run, in style...
_______________________________________________________________
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
