dman wrote: > On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 10:47:50AM +0100, Matt Sergeant wrote: > > | What headers might you want to not decode? > > The Subject: header so that weird charsets can be matched. Maybe > others too (for similar reasons). It may also be helpful to not > decode some headers if there is some deformation of them that is easy > to match.
You *should* be able to detect this based on what section of unicode the characters are in. Having said that, I'm open to both - and would support the idea of adding something like X-Raw-<foo> for any decoded header. Matt. _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
