How about sampling the network checks, so that instead of 400,000, only doing, say 500?
It seems to me that sampling a few hundred network checks would arrive at a better score for them than hand coding. My two cents, Kingsley Skip Montanaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed:17:57, Craig R Hughes wrote: [...] > SM> Aside from longer execution time, what's the > SM> downside of disabling network checks in the > SM> mass-check script? > > Well, speed, clogging your pipe, speed, flooding the > servers, speed, and last but not least, speed. > Doing 400,000 RBL lookups (to each RBL service), > hundreds of thousands of DNS MX lookups, 400,000 > razor lookups, 400,000 DCC lookups, etc, etc is > nasty. > > C > > > _______________________________________________________________ > > Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application > Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- > http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm > > _______________________________________________ > Spamassassin-talk mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk -- _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
