dman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > That's the "real" time. IOW how long you sat there waching the screen > before you saw a response from the program. > > Notice that the CPU time used by the system while in "userland" > differs by 14.66 seconds (a factor of 123) and the CPU time used in > "system space" was cut by a factor of 2. spamd was mostly sitting > idle (letting your CPU do other, useful, stuff) while it was doing the > RBL checks and the kernel didn't have to work as hard (less loading of > programs and reading of files).
Gack, ok, thanks for the more sane interpretation of how to read the time output. So it is majorly faster....less cpu intensive. _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
