Tony L. Svanstrom wrote:

TLS>  What's needed is a distributed way of GA-scoring; so that each person can keep
TLS> his e-mail private while still let his e-mail count... A 100 trusted very
TLS> active users worldwide should do the trick. =)
TLS>  Might be hell to set up, and take a week or so to get the final scores,
TLS> though. ;-)

Well, we have something like this now.  Substitute "10" for "100" though, and
"trusted, and manually re-verified by Craig" for "trusted", and that's what we
have.  Basically, there's a set of people who submit the output of mass-check
over their personal mail to me, and I consolidate/filter the results for sanity
before feeding it all to the GA running on my dual-CPU box (gives final scores
after a few hours).  I generally do this for every release.  We've had an insane
growth in user base since the last release, so I'll need to be a lot more
careful about corpus submitters for 2.30 -- which I think I'd like to release
fairly soon now since we have a lot of rule changes/fixes, and it's been almost
2 months since the last release.

C


_______________________________________________________________

Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm

_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to