Nope, only one secondary, and it runs the same version of Sendmail. (Changed to 8.11.6p2 a while back, but slightly after the bayes database was already learning)

Err, to be clearer, both primary and secondary were updated at the same time.


Alternatively, what's the token counts for that token?  And what's the
nspam and nham counts at the top of the dump?

Ok, well that first line as you probably guessed was taken from scanning an (older) spam in debug mode, so here is the relevant output from check_bayes_db, including all matches for things similiar to 8.11.6


0.000 0 0 0 non-token data: db format = on-the-fly probs, expiry, scan-counting
0.000 0 28070 0 non-token data: nspam
0.000 0 44894 0 non-token data: nham
0.000 0 102780 0 non-token data: ntokens
0.000 0 14341 0 non-token data: oldest age
0.000 0 53621 0 non-token data: current scan-count
0.000 0 52516 0 non-token data: last expiry scan-count



0.035 0 6 53544 8.11.6 0.666 23617 18961 53632 H*r:8.11.6p2 0.011 2 302 53544 8.11.6p2

Looking at those figures has just made me realise what the cause may be. Presumably the H*r: line is refering to tokens taken from *headers* and the other two are *body* tokens, correct ?


In that case, it looks like the header tokens are doing the right thing - and got 0.666 which should be a statistically indeterminate value.

However 8.11.6p2 and 8.11.6 have (if I interpret it right) shown up in the body of some hams but almost no spams ?

I can't quite see a scenario that would cause that, except maybe forwarded messages that are showing all headers.... hmm.. :)

Regards,
Simon



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100006ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/01
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to