[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Only 1.3 score by spamassassin > > > On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 10:42:00AM +0300, Jan Elmqvist Nielsen wrote: > >> How did this mail only get 1.3 by spamassassin? >> >> I am using mailscanner 4.21-9 and spamassassin 2.55 > > Are you letting MailScanner do DNSBL/RBL lookups or SpamAssasssin? > > Here with spamc/spamd 2.55 via postfix the mail scored 7.60 > mainly because of the DNSBL/RBL checks and bayes (BAYES_60 > without doing sa-learn --spam, that would probably add up the > scoring for this particular spam). > >> I can see that: >> Expand Your Penis up to 20% Thicker >> >> is in html this: >> Expand Your Pen<frame><noframes>5t669</noframes></frame>is up to 20% >> Thicker
What I dont understand is why you guys dont just pass html messages thru the rendering core of Mozilla and extract the text as the viewer would see. This would eliminate all the attempts to obscure the message. And any message with screwed up text after rendering can be checked easily enough. Bill ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100006ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/01 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
