Satya wrote:

On Jun 30, 2003 at 19:41, Tony Earnshaw wrote:



My own doubt would be: where does political correctness end? E.g., when
is some Jewish or Muslim user going to object to ham being called ham
and spam (non-ham) being called spam (non-ham)? Would their objection be
valid, because an incompetent CEO or one of his/her minions finds it so?



Yaknow what I find offensive? The people who like to find offense where there is none. I am deeply offended over this whole penile arguement. Stop the freakin' spam first!

(And oh yeah, I like to eat bacon. I find Tony Earnshaw's example
offensive. The previous two sentences are supposed to be humor. If you
the reader still find them offensive, I find *you* offensive, and this
time I'm not joking.  PS: I'm talking to you the reader, and not Tony
Earnshaw. Unless you are Tony Earnshaw.)



What I find offensive are people reply to threads on people who like to find offense where there is none, after the thread has been beaten to death.

Can we please this "stuff" and get back to stopping spam?



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100006ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/01
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to