spamassassin-talk  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [SAtalk] why is this learned as ham? Theo Van Dinter
  • RE: [SAtalk] why is this learned as ham? Martin, Jeffrey
  • Re: [SAtalk] why is this learned as ham? Theo Van Dinter
  • [SAtalk] SpamAssassin v3 ideas Fox Flanders
  • RE: [SAtalk] why is this learned as ham? Martin, Jeffrey
• [SAtalk] postfix smtp_helo_restrictions messing up with whitelist_from_rcvd ? mailinglists
• RE: [SAtalk] X-Spam-Report tags All messages as possible spam Bassett A
  • [SAtalk] X-Spam-Report tags All messages as possible spam dan
• [SAtalk] BAYES_99 on every SPAM - is this right? Darren Coleman
  • Re: [SAtalk] BAYES_99 on every SPAM - is this right? Denis Ducamp
  • Re: [SAtalk] BAYES_99 on every SPAM - is this right? Jack Gostl
  • Re: [SAtalk] BAYES_99 on every SPAM - is this right? Denis Ducamp
  • Re: [SAtalk] BAYES_99 on every SPAM - is this right? Theo Van Dinter
  • Re: [SAtalk] BAYES_99 on every SPAM - is this right? Geoff Gibbs
  • RE: [SAtalk] BAYES_99 on every SPAM - is this right? Covington, Chris
• [SAtalk] All messgages are getting X-Spam-Report as spam, even when not Dan Roberts
  • Re: [SAtalk] All messgages are getting X-Spam-Report as spam, even when not Odhiambo Washington
  • Re: [SAtalk] All messgages are getting X-Spam-Report as spam, even when not Dan Roberts
• [SAtalk] Unable to connect to any discovery servers Scott Kennedy
  • [SAtalk] Byte count boosting evasion technique Fox Flanders
• [SAtalk] Help? SA2.60 can't locate SOA.pm Related to Received headers, and BlackList(s) query in local.cf Spamassassin
  • [SAtalk] RE: Help? SA2.60 can't locate SOA.pm Related to Received headers, and BlackList(s) query in local.cf Spamassassin
  • [SAtalk] RE: Help? SA2.60 can't locate SOA.pm Related to Received headers, and BlackList(s) query in local.cf Spamassassin
• [SAtalk] Outlook rules produce FPs Kai Schaetzl
  • Re: [SAtalk] Outlook rules produce FPs Jeff Koch
  • Re: [SAtalk] Outlook rules produce FPs Kai Schaetzl
• Re: SMTP reject != bounce (was Re[2]: [SAtalk] Autodeleting spam based on score David B Funk
• [SAtalk] Debugging Spamassassin Bob Ambroso
• [SAtalk] 2.60 install RH 7.1 failed dependencies Chris Boyd
  • Re: [SAtalk] 2.60 install RH 7.1 failed dependencies Kevin Lewis
• [SAtalk] Cannot open bayes.. R/W lock failed Bret Miller
• [SAtalk] Prevalence of BASE64 messages containing '<a href=' in ham corpus Shane Allen
• RE: [SAtalk] Prevalence of BASE64 messages containing '<a href=' in ham corpus Chris Santerre
  • RE: [SAtalk] Prevalence of BASE64 messages containing '<a href=' in ham corpus daniel lance herrick
• RE: [SAtalk] Spam Assassin for w32 Chris Santerre
  • RE: [SAtalk] Spam Assassin for w32 Paul Hutchings
  • Re: [SAtalk] Spam Assassin for w32 Barry Porter
• [SAtalk] blacklist_to Colin A. Bartlett
  • Re: [SAtalk] blacklist_to Justin Mason
  • Re: [SAtalk] blacklist_to Fred I-IS.COM
  • [SAtalk] RE: blacklist_to Colin A. Bartlett
  • Re: [SAtalk] RE: blacklist_to Brian Morrison
• [SAtalk] new mail with old headers Daniel Liston
• [SAtalk] More Bayes (again) Jack Gostl
  • Re: [SAtalk] More Bayes (again) Simon Byrnand
  • Re: [SAtalk] More Bayes (again) Jack Gostl
  • Re: [SAtalk] More Bayes (again) Justin Mason
  • Re: [SAtalk] More Bayes (again) Simon Byrnand
  • Re: [SAtalk] More Bayes (again) Jack Gostl
  • RE: [SAtalk] More Bayes (again) Smart,Dan
• [SAtalk] Will just header work for Bayes Smart,Dan
  • Re: [SAtalk] Will just header work for Bayes Theo Van Dinter
• [SAtalk] Upgraded from 2.60beta to 2.60 final, now problems Chris Barnes
  • [SAtalk] Re: Upgraded from 2.60beta to 2.60 final, now problems Malte S. Stretz
  • [SAtalk] Re: Upgraded from 2.60beta to 2.60 final, now problems Chris Barnes
  • [SAtalk] Re: Upgraded from 2.60beta to 2.60 final, now problems Malte S. Stretz
  • [SAtalk] Re: Upgraded from 2.60beta to 2.60 final, now problems Chris Barnes
• [SAtalk] DCC timeout not working with spamd 2.55 brandon pearson (BITS)
• [SAtalk] required value met, but spam not flagged John Schneider
  • Re: [SAtalk] required value met, but spam not flagged Theo Van Dinter
  • RE: [SAtalk] required value met, but spam not flagged John Schneider
  • Re: [SAtalk] required value met, but spam not flagged Sean McCrohan
  • Re: [SAtalk] required value met, but spam not flagged Patrick Morris
  • Re: [SAtalk] required value met, but spam not flagged mikea
• [SAtalk] pyzor not found Mike Carlson
  • [SAtalk] spamassassin database moved with 2.60 Forrest Aldrich
• [SAtalk] 10_misc.cf in brazilian portuguese ZOE - Marcelo
  • Re: [SAtalk] 10_misc.cf in brazilian portuguese Justin Mason
• [SAtalk] Bayes db in mysql Chris Hilts
  • Re: [SAtalk] Bayes db in mysql Michael Parker
• [SAtalk] Cannot debug spamassassin Bob Ambroso
  • Re: [SAtalk] Cannot debug spamassassin Ralf Guenthner
• [SAtalk] bayes db locking Fletcher Mattox
• RE: [SAtalk] 2.60 Upgrade - SpamD not using trained bayes databas e Smart,Dan
• [SAtalk] Spam Assassin Question Bob Ambroso
• [SAtalk] sa-learn learns mbox, but bayes doesn't work Robert Krüger
• [SAtalk] Microsoft Outlook and saving spams for learning.. Richard Bates
  • [SAtalk] Re: Microsoft Outlook and saving spams for learning.. Malte S. Stretz
  • Re: [SAtalk] Microsoft Outlook and saving spams for learning.. Barry Porter
  • RE: [SAtalk] Microsoft Outlook and saving spams for learning.. Steven Manross
  • Re: [SAtalk] Microsoft Outlook and saving spams for learning.. Richard Bates
  • RE: [SAtalk] Microsoft Outlook and saving spams for learning.. Brad Tarver
  • Re: [SAtalk] Microsoft Outlook and saving spams for learning.. Richard Bates
  • [SAtalk] Spam Assassin for w32 Your Own ISP .com
  • Re: [SAtalk] Spam Assassin for w32 Frank Pineau
  • RE: [SAtalk] Spam Assassin for w32 Matt Andreko
  • RE: [SAtalk] Spam Assassin for w32 Steve Murphy
  • Re: [SAtalk] Spam Assassin for w32 Martin Schroeder
  • RE: [SAtalk] Microsoft Outlook and saving spams for learning.. Steven Manross
  • RE: [SAtalk] Microsoft Outlook and saving spams for learning.. Paul Hutchings
• [SAtalk] dynablock confusion... VonEssen, John
  • Re: [SAtalk] dynablock confusion... Matt Kettler
  • Re: [SAtalk] dynablock confusion... Robert Leonard III
  • RE: [SAtalk] dynablock confusion... VonEssen, John
  • RE: [SAtalk] dynablock confusion... Morris Jones
  • RE: [SAtalk] dynablock confusion... Satya
• [SAtalk] Bayes - Oops Jack Gostl
• [SAtalk] where do i defined what should happen with SPAM mails Mrvka Andreas
  • Re: [SAtalk] where do i defined what should happen with SPAM mails Ralf Guenthner
  • Re: [SAtalk] where do i defined what should happen with SPAM mails Martin Schroeder
  • [SAtalk] Re: where do i defined what should happen with SPAM mails Chris Barnes
• [SAtalk] Silly question about whitelist to a certain mailbox Jennifer Fountain
  • Re: [SAtalk] Silly question about whitelist to a certain mailbox Fred
  • Re: [SAtalk] Silly question about whitelist to a certain mailbox Sean McCrohan
  • RE: [SAtalk] Silly question about whitelist to a certain mailbox Info Desk
  • Re: [SAtalk] Silly question about whitelist to a certain mailbox Matt Kettler
  • RE: [SAtalk] Silly question about whitelist to a certain mailbox Bill Polhemus
  • RE: [SAtalk] Silly question about whitelist to a certain mailbox Jennifer Fountain
  • RE: [SAtalk] Silly question about whitelist to a certain mailbox Paul Hutchings
  • RE: [SAtalk] Silly question about whitelist to a certain mailbox Jennifer Fountain
• [SAtalk] updating SAProxy with latest rules tek1
• [SAtalk] Using Mail::Spamassassin with MailTools? Robert Nicholson
• [SAtalk] X-Header: SUBJ_ILLEGAL_CHARS Thorsten Franzke
  • Re: [SAtalk] X-Header: SUBJ_ILLEGAL_CHARS Alexander Litvinov
  • Re: [SAtalk] X-Header: SUBJ_ILLEGAL_CHARS David B Funk
• [SAtalk] can't install Daniel Tan
• [SAtalk] Replacing procmail with Mail::Audit? Robert Nicholson
• [SAtalk] Tons of emails that are masqueraded Peter Richards
  • Re: [SAtalk] Tons of emails that are masqueraded Martin Schroeder
  • Re: [SAtalk] Tons of emails that are masqueraded Peter Richards
  • Re: [SAtalk] Tons of emails that are masqueraded Peter Richards
  • Re: [SAtalk] Tons of emails that are masqueraded Fred
  • Re: [SAtalk] Tons of emails that are masqueraded Peter Richards
• [SAtalk] Bayes (again) Jack Gostl
  • Re: [SAtalk] Bayes (again) Matt Kettler
  • Re: [SAtalk] Bayes (again) Jack Gostl
  • Re: [SAtalk] Bayes (again) Jack Gostl
  • Re: [SAtalk] Bayes (again) Matt Kettler
  • RE: [SAtalk] Bayes (again) Tom Meunier
  • RE: [SAtalk] Bayes (again) Jack Gostl
• [SAtalk] Forwarding email to learn Mike Carlson
  • Re: [SAtalk] Forwarding email to learn Adam Beatham
• [SAtalk] Does the * in the X-Spam-Level header upset procmail Nigel Wilkinson
  • Re: [SAtalk] Does the * in the X-Spam-Level header upset procmail Michael Demmer
  • [SAtalk] Re: Does the * in the X-Spam-Level header upset procmail Malte S. Stretz
  • Re: [SAtalk] Does the * in the X-Spam-Level header upset procmail Satya
  • Re: [SAtalk] Does the * in the X-Spam-Level header upset procmail Nigel Wilkinson
  • Re: [SAtalk] Does the * in the X-Spam-Level header upset procmail Sean McCrohan
• [SAtalk] Default behavior of check Steven Manross
  • Re: [SAtalk] Default behavior of check David B Funk
  • Re: [SAtalk] Default behavior of check Matt Kettler
• [SAtalk] Re: Restart Spamd Mark Edwards
• [SAtalk] understanding header Eric
• [SAtalk] selective blacklists Owen Becker
• [SAtalk] chi squared combining Matt Tolton
  • Re: [SAtalk] chi squared combining Ross Vandegrift
• [SAtalk] sa-learn + vpopmail Doug Ledbetter
  • [SAtalk] 30 seconds to process an email??? Jeff Koch
  • Re: [SAtalk] 30 seconds to process an email??? Ed Kasky
  • Re: [SAtalk] 30 seconds to process an email??? Theo Van Dinter
  • Re: [SAtalk] 30 seconds to process an email??? Jeff Koch
  • Re: [SAtalk] 30 seconds to process an email??? Theo Van Dinter
  • Re: [SAtalk] 30 seconds to process an email??? Steve Thomas
  • Re: [SAtalk] 30 seconds to process an email??? Jeff Koch
  • Re: [SAtalk] 30 seconds to process an email??? Dave Goodrich
• RE: [SAtalk] Re: Automating usage of sa-learn Tom Meunier
  • RE: [SAtalk] Re: Automating usage of sa-learn Steven Manross
• [SAtalk] sendmail question Vivek Kumar
  • Re: [SAtalk] sendmail question Patrick Morris
  • Re: [SAtalk] sendmail question David B Funk
• [SAtalk] Problems using -l switch? Henry Kwan
• [SAtalk] uninitialized value Tomasz Matuszewski
  • [SAtalk] uninitialized value Tomasz Matuszewski
• [SAtalk] WEIRD Razor2 Error Scott Rothgaber
  • Re: [SAtalk] WEIRD Razor2 Error Patrick Morris
• [SAtalk] FAKE_HELO_AOL and/or NO_RDNS_DOTCOM_HELO broken? Michael Weber
• [SAtalk] Re: 'Opt' Robert Leonard III
  • Re: [SAtalk] Re: 'Opt' Fred I-IS.COM
• [SAtalk] DB_File Jack Gostl
  • Re: [SAtalk] DB_File Jack Gostl
  • Re: [SAtalk] DB_File Adam Stein
  • [SAtalk] DB_File Jack Gostl
  • Re: [SAtalk] DB_File David B Funk
  • Re: [SAtalk] DB_File Jack Gostl
  • Re: [SAtalk] DB_File Theo Van Dinter
  • Re: [SAtalk] DB_File Jack Gostl
  • Re: [SAtalk] DB_File David B Funk
  • Re: [SAtalk] DB_File Jack Gostl
  • Fishing lesson (Re: [SAtalk] DB_File David B Funk
• [SAtalk] Why is P***** Enlarge score so low bob
  • Re: [SAtalk] Why is P***** Enlarge score so low Theo Van Dinter
• [SAtalk] spamd Crashing candee
• [SAtalk] FW: [qmr] Spamassasin Question Bob Ambroso
• [SAtalk] 'Opt' rleonard
  • [SAtalk] Re: 'Opt' Malte S. Stretz
  • Re: [SAtalk] 'Opt' Burt Juda
  • Re: [SAtalk] 'Opt' Robert Leonard III
  • Re: [SAtalk] 'Opt' Matt Kettler
  • Re: [SAtalk] 'Opt' Satya
  • Re: [SAtalk] 'Opt' Robert Menschel
• [SAtalk] Performance tuning spamd Sean McCrohan
  • Re: [SAtalk] Performance tuning spamd Martin Schroeder
• [SAtalk] When is the journal used Thomas Schulz
  • Re: [SAtalk] When is the journal used Theo Van Dinter
• [SAtalk] spamd & qmail, round 2... Roger Merchberger
  • Re: [SAtalk] spamd & qmail, round 2... Dave Sill
  • [SAtalk] Re: spamd & qmail, round 2... Klaus Alexander Seistrup
  • Re: [SAtalk] Re: spamd & qmail, round 2... Ralf Guenthner
  • Re: [SAtalk] Re: spamd & qmail, round 2... Roger Merchberger
  • Re: [SAtalk] Re: spamd & qmail, round 2... Ralf Guenthner

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]