The original code for this rule is: header __OPT_HEADER_SUBJ ALL =~ /^(?:Resent-)?Subject:.*opt.?(in|out|oem|ed|ion-in|[EMAIL PROTECTED])(?:\b|\d|\@)/im header __OPT_HEADER_ALL ALL =~ /opt.?(?:in|out|oem|ed|ion-in|[EMAIL PROTECTED])(?:\b|\d|\@)/i meta OPT_HEADER (__OPT_HEADER_ALL && !__OPT_HEADER_SUBJ) describe OPT_HEADER Headers include an "opt"ed phrase
I would suggest something like this: header __OPT_HEADER_SUBJ ALL =~ /^(?:Resent-)?Subject:.*opt.?(in|out|oem|ed|ion-in|[EMAIL PROTECTED])(?:\b|\d|\@)/im header __OPT_HEADER_ALL ALL =~ /opt.?(?:in|out|oem|ed|ion-in|[EMAIL PROTECTED])(?:\b|\d|\@)/i header __OPT_OPTO22 ALL =~ /opto22/i meta OPT_HEADER (__OPT_HEADER_ALL && !__OPT_HEADER_SUBJ && !__OPT_OPTO22) describe OPT_HEADER Headers include an "opt"ed phrase I added this: header __OPT_OPTO22 ALL =~ /opto22/i meta OPT_HEADER (__OPT_HEADER_ALL && !__OPT_HEADER_SUBJ && !__OPT_OPTO22) Frederic Tarasevicius Internet Information Services, Inc. http://www.i-is.com/ 810-794-4400 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Robert Leonard III wrote: > Yes, that is the tag I am referring to.. I just updated to 2.60 and > this problem came with it.. I did lower it to 0.1.. I believe it > was 2.4 originally.. > Would like to use the rule, but I guess it needs to be more specific > for my case alone.. anybody know how I could modify that rule so it > excluded "Opto22" from it's findings? > Thanks! > > >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Malte S. Stretz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 11:27 AM >> Subject: [SAtalk] Re: 'Opt' >> >> >>> On Tuesday 30 September 2003 17:18 CET [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>>> My company is "Opto22".. this rule adds 2.4 points to every email >>>> that comes into my company because of our name.. >>> >>> ... I guess you're talking about OPT_HEADER? >>> >>>> is there any way to fix this >>>> rule so that "Opto" isn't seen as 'opt'? Or do I have to just >>>> modify the rules so that this particular rule gets 0.0 points? >>> >>> Upgrade to 2.60 or lower the score. It's only 0.1 in 2.60 anyway... >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Malte >>> >>> -- >>> [SGT] Simon G. Tatham: "How to Report Bugs Effectively" >>> <http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html> >>> [ESR] Eric S. Raymond: "How To Ask Questions The Smart Way" >>> <http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html> >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------- >>> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek >>> Welcome to geek heaven. >>> http://thinkgeek.com/sf >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Spamassassin-talk mailing list >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Spamassassin-talk mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
