Thanks for the quick reply. I'm sure this must have been in the list archives. <sheepish grin> Thanks.
Regards, John Schneider Information Systems Manager, DAUM Commercial Real Estate Services -----Original Message----- From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 9:01 AM To: John Schneider Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] required value met, but spam not flagged On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 08:55:08AM -0700, John Schneider wrote: > I have been working too much lately, so my eyes might be a little > crossed.... But, the following message seems to have met the required > value for spam, but was not flagged: > > X-Spam-Level: ******* > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=8.0 required=8.0 > tests=BAYES_90,FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD, > > Can anyone offer any insight I might have missed with my low-levels of > sleep? <grin> Sure, the actual score was 7.95 to 7.99999 (repeatedly). It rounds to 8.0 for the display, but is actually less than 8, so it didn't trigger. -- Randomly Generated Tagline: "My opinions are my own. My employer doesn't want them." - Unknown ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
