On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 06:32:23PM -0400, Jeff Koch wrote: > > Does it make sense that our maillog would report it take 30 seconds for > spamassassin to analyze a message - and they seem to be short messages. > We're running 2.55 via maildrop on a qmail system. The machine is a 2.4 Ghz > P4 server with 1GB Ram and a 120GB 7200 rpm IDE Hard Disk. Server CPU load > is running about .25. We've got about 1000 email accounts. User prefs are > stored in a MySQL DB. Here are two log entries:
We have two servers, one for dialups with a single domain and 5000 accounts, another for domain accounts, both machines are the same hardware. Domain mail - a Sparc 20 with 512mb ram and dual 195mhz CPUs. We have 200+ domains and over 1000 accounts with spamfiltering. We trigger spamc from .qmail files via a custom script, creating each user a separate prefs and bayes database. We average 3 to 9 seconds to process a message at the rate of 7k to 10k messages a day through SA. Ok...What I did to lower processing time, I dropped all DNS checks. I let rblsmtpd do that, that is 30k messages a day SA doesn't have to process. I dropped Razor. I dropped DCC. I moved spamc to the .qmail file, no sense processing a message that has no local delivery. qmail, SA 2.55. Hope that helps. DAve > > Sep 30 08:31:40 avspamfilter spamd[25605]: identified spam (10.1/4.0) for > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > rompines.com:0 in 30.4 seconds, 3103 bytes. > Sep 30 08:31:56 avspamfilter spamd[25636]: clean message (0.0/4.0) for > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > nter.com:0 in 31.5 seconds, 1087 bytes. > > Any advice on how to improve performance would be appreciated. > -- Dave Goodrich (812)378-4100 http://www.tls.net I can save you money on Long Distance...Ask me how! ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
