Ah, I see, the BAYES_50 score would be ignored when scoring it for
autolearning.
There must have been something else wrong, though, since after I copied
the Bayes db from the production system, I get:
-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=6.2 required=6.0 tests=BAYES_99,HTML_MESSAGE,
MIME_HTML_ONLY,REMOVE_SUBJ autolearn=no version=2.60
Strange that it would trip more non-Bayes rules after restoring the
Bayes db (I didn't change anything else)
Thanks for the pointer, Theo.
-----Original Message-----
From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 9:47 AM
To: Martin, Jeffrey
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] why is this learned as ham?
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 09:35:44AM -0400, Martin, Jeffrey wrote:
> But the example scored 0.4, so it still shouldn't be autolearned,
> right?
run with -D and read the Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf doc, specifically the
section about bayes_auto_learn.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"I develop for Linux for a living, I used to develop for DOS. Going
from
DOS to Linux is like trading a glider for an F117." - F. Sweetser
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
