RE: [SAtalk] Prevalence of BASE64 messages containing '

How about adding one for ' '?

> > Off the top of my head, this sounds like an acceptable thing (based
> > solely on my corpus) that could lead to a significant
> > reduction in spam.
> >
> > However, we wish to avoid false positives, and so we're wondering how
> > frequently a legit email is seen that contains a HTML-formatted link
> > that is also base64 encoded.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > --
> > Shane Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > http://www.emphasys.net
> >
>
> 1) You read my mind! I've wanted to do this for quite some time. I've been
> gathering more of the Base64 spam.
> 2) This should not be the ONE thing that makes it spam. Score it 1-1.5
> points MAX.
> 3) More tags should be used then just this one, but it is a great start!
>
> 4) Send the rules to the SA Rule Emporeum, or you will have 7 years bad luck
> ;)
>
> Chris Santerre
> System Admin and SA Custom Rules Emporium keeper
> http://www.merchantsoverseas.com/wwwroot/gorilla/sa_rules.htm
> "A little nonsense now and then, is relished by the wisest men." - Willy
> Wonka
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> Spamassassin-talk mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
>



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk