On 2003-09-30 13:43:59 -0400, Sean McCrohan wrote:
> I've lowered the maximum message size and I'm running spamd with '-m 3'
> to lower the number of simultaneous threads. What else can I do to
> reduce the processing overhead?
3 ist large for old machines. Use it only if you have enough
memory.
> It occurred to me that there might be certain tests that are particularly
> costly for larger messages, and that I could run large messages through a
> reduced battery of tests, but I'm not sure if that's actually so.
You could reduce the max size for spamc (1).
Best regards
Martin
--
Martin Schröder, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ArtCom GmbH, Lise-Meitner-Str 5, 28359 Bremen, Germany
Voice +49 421 20419-44 / Fax +49 421 20419-10
http://www.artcom-gmbh.de
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
