Jack Gostl writes: >Now I'm really really confused. I wiped the Bayes database and did a >spam/ham learning run. Here is the output from sa-learn. > >Learned from 13 message(s) (13 message(s) examined). >Learned from 121 message(s) (121 message(s) examined). >Learned from 274 message(s) (274 message(s) examined). >Learned from 717 message(s) (717 message(s) examined). >Learned from 126 message(s) (126 message(s) examined). >Learned from 106 message(s) (106 message(s) examined). >Learned from 331 message(s) (331 message(s) examined). >synced Bayes databases from journal in 1380 seconds: 329773 unique entries > >And here is the output from my "sa-learn --dump magic" > >0.000 0 2 0 non-token data: bayes db version >0.000 0 1 0 non-token data: nspam >0.000 0 0 0 non-token data: nham >0.000 0 116 0 non-token data: ntokens > ---snip--- > >Its as if the only updates were from auto-learn. What am I missing?
It's got to be reading the wrong files. Do an "sa-learn" of a small number of mails with -D on. Then run "sa-learn -D --dump magic". Post the 2 log files and let's see if that makes any sense... --j. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
