----- Original Message ----- From: "Klaus Alexander Seistrup" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 8:22 PM Subject: [SAtalk] Re: spamd & qmail, round 2...
> On Roger Merchberger wrote: > > > 1) Is anyone else running spamd from tcpserver? > > I've been running spamd under dæmontools/supervise with a run file > similar to yours for months -- works like a charm. > > (You did mean supervise rather than tcpserver, didn't you?) > > > // Klaus > > -- > ><> o mordo tua nuora, o aro un autodromo Hi I'm also running spamd under supervise and just recently I asked this list why I couldn't get the -D option to work. Where were you guys then? ;-) I solved it in the meantime by sending the debug output to a separate logfile via multilog. Otherwise, no problems with that setup and no need to worry about spamd crashing and mails getting deferred overnight. Regards Ralf G. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
