On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 12:00:41PM -0400 or thereabouts, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 08:55:08AM -0700, John Schneider wrote: > > I have been working too much lately, so my eyes might be a little > > crossed.... But, the following message seems to have met the required value > > for spam, but was not flagged: > > > > X-Spam-Level: ******* > > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=8.0 required=8.0 tests=BAYES_90,FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD,
> Sure, the actual score was 7.95 to 7.99999 (repeatedly). It rounds to > 8.0 for the display, but is actually less than 8, so it didn't trigger. One clue here, by the way, is that it lists a score of 8.0, but X-Spam-Level has 7 stars. --S ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
