On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 08:55:08AM -0700, John Schneider wrote: > I have been working too much lately, so my eyes might be a little > crossed.... But, the following message seems to have met the required value > for spam, but was not flagged: > > Received: from supply.erhouse.com ([211.217.250.70]) > by server.com (8.12.8/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h91FMGUx066014 > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 1 Oct 2003 08:22:29 -0700 (PDT) > (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) > Received: from beloit ([211.158.44.35]) by supply.erhouse.com with Microsoft > SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); > Thu, 2 Oct 2003 00:18:39 +0900 > Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 15:16:31 GMT > From: "Steven Hirsch"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: confirmation > Mime-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Oct 2003 15:18:39.0992 (UTC) > FILETIME=[4B044F80:01C3882F] > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on > server.com > X-Spam-Level: ******* > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=8.0 required=8.0 tests=BAYES_90,FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD, > HTML_FONT_INVISIBLE,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_02,HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY, > MY_DOMAIN_ENDS_NUMS,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_SBL autolearn=no > version=2.60 > > Can anyone offer any insight I might have missed with my low-levels of > sleep? <grin>
Whitelisted? -- Mike Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tired old sysadmin since 1964 ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
