spamassassin-talk  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [SAtalk] If they're going to advertise it ... Charlie Watts
• [SAtalk] Rules for "Monster Crush" spam Michael Moncur
• [SAtalk] [Bug 126] New: Suggested rules for embedded HTML objects bugzilla-daemon
• [SAtalk] [Bug 125] [Debian 139777] Description for DATE_IN_FUTURE is wrong. bugzilla-daemon
  • [SAtalk] [Bug 125] [Debian 139777] Description for DATE_IN_FUTURE is wrong. bugzilla-daemon
  • [SAtalk] [Bug 125] [Debian 139777] Description for DATE_IN_FUTURE is wrong. bugzilla-daemon
• [SAtalk] [Bug 121] My online telephone bill gets tagged as SPAM bugzilla-daemon
  • [SAtalk] [Bug 121] My online telephone bill gets tagged as SPAM bugzilla-daemon
• [SAtalk] More misc rules Matthew Cline
  • Re: [SAtalk] More misc rules Bart Schaefer
  • Re: [SAtalk] More misc rules Matthew Cline
  • Re: [SAtalk] More misc rules Craig R Hughes
  • Re: [SAtalk] More misc rules Craig R Hughes
• [SAtalk] More rules for SPAM_PHRASES? Matthew Cline
  • RE: [SAtalk] More rules for SPAM_PHRASES? Michael Moncur
  • Re: [SAtalk] More rules for SPAM_PHRASES? Matthew Cline
  • RE: [SAtalk] More rules for SPAM_PHRASES? Craig R Hughes
  • [SAtalk] Re: More rules for SPAM_PHRASES? Daniel Pittman
• [SAtalk] [Bug 125] New: [Debian 139777] Description for DATE_IN_FUTURE is wrong. bugzilla-daemon
• [SAtalk] idea: Rules about other rules Matthew Cline
  • Re: [SAtalk] idea: Rules about other rules Duncan Findlay
  • Re: [SAtalk] idea: Rules about other rules Rob McMillin
  • Re: [SAtalk] idea: Rules about other rules Craig R Hughes
• [SAtalk] [Bug 124] spamd pid patch bugzilla-daemon
• [SAtalk] [Bug 124] New: spamd pid patch bugzilla-daemon
• [SAtalk] [Bug 123] New: Attached Spam crashes spamassassin bugzilla-daemon
• [SAtalk] [Bug 122] New: LINE_OF_YELLING matches line of just periods bugzilla-daemon
• [SAtalk] [Bug 121] New: My online telephone bill gets tagged as SPAM bugzilla-daemon
• [SAtalk] Perl implementation of spamc? Ian R. Justman
• [SAtalk] SA POP Proxy droped... Nick Fisher
• [SAtalk] Bug#139211: Mime decode and Outlook Mac 5.x Duncan Findlay
  • Re: [SAtalk] Bug#139211: Mime decode and Outlook Mac 5.x dman
• [SAtalk] [Bug 120] New: No subject yields "All caps" test result bugzilla-daemon
  • [SAtalk] Re: [Bug 120] New: No subject yields "All caps" test result [patch] Matt Dunford
• [SAtalk] Latest CVS fails "make test" Bart Schaefer
  • Re: [SAtalk] Latest CVS fails "make test" Bart Schaefer
  • [SAtalk] Whitelist revisited Mark
• [SAtalk] spamd and system wide whitelist David
  • Re: [SAtalk] spamd and system wide whitelist Bart Schaefer
  • Re: [SAtalk] spamd and system wide whitelist Doug Herr
  • Re: [SAtalk] spamd and system wide whitelist David
  • Re: [SAtalk] spamd and system wide whitelist Olivier Nicole
  • Re: [SAtalk] spamd and system wide whitelist Craig R Hughes
• [SAtalk] [Fwd: Patch for SpamAssassin] Justin Mason
  • Re: [SAtalk] [Fwd: Patch for SpamAssassin] Matt Sergeant
• [SAtalk] [Bug 119] New: spamd paranoid mode behavior bugzilla-daemon
• [SAtalk] Using "m!regexp!" or "m{regexp}"? Matthew Cline
  • Re: [SAtalk] Using "m!regexp!" or "m{regexp}"? Matt Sergeant
• [SAtalk] v2.11, -r and -P not working together? Robert Abatecola
• [SAtalk] modified rules Ben Jackson
  • [SAtalk] modified rules Ben Jackson
• [SAtalk] qmail + vmailmgrd Gilles HANOTEL
  • RE: [SAtalk] qmail + vmailmgrd Tony Hoyle
• [SAtalk] new rules: general spam rules Ben Jackson
  • Re: [SAtalk] new rules: general spam rules Bart Schaefer
  • Re: [SAtalk] new rules: general spam rules Craig R Hughes
  • Re: [SAtalk] new rules: general spam rules Ben Jackson
• [SAtalk] new rules: suggestions for the new spamassassin user Ben Jackson
• [SAtalk] hi sa-talk, my name is ben, and I get spam Ben Jackson
  • Re: [SAtalk] hi sa-talk, my name is ben, and I get spam Matt Sergeant
  • Re: [SAtalk] hi sa-talk, my name is ben, and I get spam Sidney Markowitz
  • Re: [SAtalk] hi sa-talk, my name is ben, and I get spam rODbegbie
  • Re: [SAtalk] hi sa-talk, my name is ben, and I get spam Sidney Markowitz
• [SAtalk] Patches and updates Kenneth Chen
  • Re: [SAtalk] Patches and updates Craig Hughes
  • Re: [SAtalk] Patches and updates Rob McMillin
  • Re: [SAtalk] Patches and updates Craig Hughes
  • Re: [SAtalk] Patches and updates Charlie Watts
  • Re: [SAtalk] Patches and updates Matt Sergeant
  • Re: [SAtalk] Patches and updates Craig Hughes
• [SAtalk] Some changes to get_decoded_stripped_body_text_array() Matthew Cline
  • Re: [SAtalk] Some changes to get_decoded_stripped_body_text_array() Matthew Cline
  • Re: [SAtalk] Some changes to get_decoded_stripped_body_text_array() Theo Van Dinter
  • Re: [SAtalk] Some changes to get_decoded_stripped_body_text_array() Matt Sergeant
• [SAtalk] Install question Rich Duzenbury
• [SAtalk] postfix + spamassassin + mailstats Ron 'The InSaNe One' Rosson
• [SAtalk] SA not running properly Darrin Ward
• [SAtalk] Stupid SpamAssassin tricks... Mark Roedel
• [SAtalk] Header oddities dgillett
  • Re: [SAtalk] Header oddities Daniel Rogers
• [SAtalk] Bypassing "unsubscribe" test for known mailing lists? Christopher Faylor
  • Re: [SAtalk] Bypassing "unsubscribe" test for known mailing lists? Sidney Markowitz
  • Re: [SAtalk] Bypassing "unsubscribe" test for known mailing lists? Christopher Faylor
• [SAtalk] Spamd problem when slocal used in .forward? Timothy Demarest
• [SAtalk] Rules for em5000.net spam Michael Moncur
• [SAtalk] New install doesn't put right x header Rich Wellner
  • Re: [SAtalk] New install doesn't put right x header Craig Hughes
  • Re: [SAtalk] New install doesn't put right x header (solution) Rich Wellner
• [SAtalk] ADV prefix not firing properly Tony Hoyle
  • Re: [SAtalk] ADV prefix not firing properly Kelsey Cummings
• [SAtalk] How to deal with <BASE HREF="URI">? Matthew Cline
  • Re: [SAtalk] How to deal with <BASE HREF="URI">? Matt Sergeant
  • Re: [SAtalk] How to deal with <BASE HREF="URI">? Craig Hughes
• [SAtalk] Unusual munging of "To" hostname Matthew Cline
• [SAtalk] Some changes to unsub/remove URI rules Matthew Cline
  • Re: [SAtalk] Some changes to unsub/remove URI rules Bart Schaefer
• [SAtalk] Anyone seeing a spamc/spamd timeout? Scott Doty
  • Re: [SAtalk] Anyone seeing a spamc/spamd timeout? Nick Rothwell
  • RE: [SAtalk] Anyone seeing a spamc/spamd timeout? CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson
  • Re: [SAtalk] Anyone seeing a spamc/spamd timeout? Scott Doty
• [SAtalk] Improvement to NVALID_MSGID Matthew Cline
  • Re: [SAtalk] Improvement to NVALID_MSGID Theo Van Dinter
  • Re: [SAtalk] Improvement to NVALID_MSGID Matthew Cline
  • Re: [SAtalk] Improvement to NVALID_MSGID Greg Ward
  • Re: [SAtalk] Improvement to NVALID_MSGID Theo Van Dinter
  • Re: [SAtalk] Improvement to NVALID_MSGID Greg Ward
• [SAtalk] Spamassassin / Mailscanner Kelly Hamlin
• [SAtalk] spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net Josh Levine
• [SAtalk] Failed test Razor::Client Lewis Bergman
  • Re: [SAtalk] Failed test Razor::Client Matthew Cline
  • RE: [SAtalk] Failed test Razor::Client CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson
  • RE: [SAtalk] Failed test Razor::Client Maurits Bloos
  • RE: [SAtalk] Failed test Razor::Client Craig Hughes
• [SAtalk] suggested rule: exclamation marks in body Michael Blakeley
  • [SAtalk] spamassassin -r problem Michael Blakeley
  • Re: [SAtalk] spamassassin -r problem Matthew Cline
  • Re: [SAtalk] spamassassin -r problem Michael Blakeley
  • Re: [SAtalk] spamassassin -r problem Craig Hughes
  • CPAN (Re: [SAtalk] spamassassin -r problem) Bart Schaefer
  • [SAtalk] CPAN install errors Michael Blakeley
• [SAtalk] Sig TERM, sig HUP, or what for spamd? Doug Herr
  • Re: [SAtalk] Sig TERM, sig HUP, or what for spamd? Craig Hughes
• RE: [SAtalk] spamproxyd : 'sending spam to a spamtrap box & the i ntended recip ient' Tony Hoyle
• RE: [SAtalk] spamproxyd : 'sending spam to a spamtrap box & the intended recip ient' Maurits Bloos
• [SAtalk] ORBZ shutdown Jason
  • Re: [SAtalk] ORBZ shutdown Matthew Cline
  • Re: [SAtalk] ORBZ shutdown Theo Van Dinter
  • Re: [SAtalk] ORBZ shutdown Søren Boll Overgaard
  • Re: [SAtalk] ORBZ shutdown Theo Van Dinter
  • Re: [SAtalk] ORBZ shutdown David Cantrell
  • Re: [SAtalk] ORBZ shutdown Lars Hansson
• [SAtalk] spamproxyd : 'sending spam to a spamtrap box & the intended recipient' Maurits Bloos
  • Re: [SAtalk] spamproxyd : 'sending spam to a spamtrap box & the intended recip ient' Greg Ward
  • [SAtalk] Re: spamproxyd : 'sending spam to a spamtrap box & the intendedrecip ient' Daniel Pittman
• [SAtalk] Razor with spamassassin Henrik Lewander
• [SAtalk] CC new bugzilla bugs to SAtalk? Matthew Cline
  • Re: [SAtalk] CC new bugzilla bugs to SAtalk? Craig Hughes
• Re: [SAtalk] Patch to find rules in $Config{prefix} Craig Hughes
• [SAtalk] Bugzilla bug #83 Daniel Rogers
• [SAtalk] Spamd, sendmail, and procmail on a raq3 AHA Lists
  • Re: [SAtalk] Spamd, sendmail, and procmail on a raq3 Jeffrey Bacon
  • Re: [SAtalk] Spamd, sendmail, and procmail on a raq3 AHA Lists
  • Re: [SAtalk] Spamd, sendmail, and procmail on a raq3 Bart Schaefer
  • Re: [SAtalk] Spamd, sendmail, and procmail on a raq3 AHA Lists
  • Re: [SAtalk] Spamd, sendmail, and procmail on a raq3 Theo Van Dinter
  • Re: [SAtalk] Spamd, sendmail, and procmail on a raq3 Bart Schaefer
  • Re: [SAtalk] Spamd, sendmail, and procmail on a raq3 Sidney Markowitz
• [SAtalk] Another unique subject ID regexp Matthew Cline
• [SAtalk] spamproxyd process in 2.11 ... Marc G. Fournier
  • RE: [SAtalk] spamproxyd process in 2.11 ... Maurits Bloos
• [SAtalk] content-type html validity? Charlie Watts
• [SAtalk] COPYRIGHT_CLAIMED score way too negative Rob McMillin
  • Re: [SAtalk] COPYRIGHT_CLAIMED score way too negative Rob McMillin
• [SAtalk] Trouble running spam daemon with procmail AHA Lists
  • Re: [SAtalk] Trouble running spam daemon with procmail Bart Schaefer
  • Re: [SAtalk] Trouble running spam daemon with procmail AHA Lists
• [SAtalk] "... can only be viewed in HTML" Bart Schaefer
  • [SAtalk] Skipping multipart/related is bad Bart Schaefer
  • Re: [SAtalk] Skipping multipart/related is bad Bart Schaefer
  • Re: [SAtalk] Skipping multipart/related is bad Daniel Rogers
  • Re: [SAtalk] Skipping multipart/related is bad Daniel Rogers
  • Re: [SAtalk] Skipping multipart/related is bad Bart Schaefer
  • Re: [SAtalk] Skipping multipart/related is bad Daniel Rogers
  • Re: [SAtalk] Skipping multipart/related is bad Bart Schaefer
  • Re: [SAtalk] Skipping multipart/related is bad dman
  • Re: [SAtalk] Skipping multipart/related is bad Matthew Cline
  • [SAtalk] Re: Skipping multipart/related is bad Daniel Pittman
  • Re: [SAtalk] Skipping multipart/related is bad Craig Hughes
  • Re: [SAtalk] Skipping multipart/related is bad Nels Lindquist
  • Re: [SAtalk] Skipping multipart/related is bad Daniel Rogers
  • Re: [SAtalk] Skipping multipart/related is bad Craig Hughes
  • Re: [SAtalk] Skipping multipart/related is bad Daniel Rogers
  • Re: [SAtalk] Skipping multipart/related is bad Greg Ward
• Re: #2 Re: [SAtalk] getting spamd to work with sendmail Jeff Bacon
  • Re: #2 Re: [SAtalk] getting spamd to work with sendmail Jeffrey Bacon
  • [SAtalk] Re: #2 Re: getting spamd to work with sendmail sinewave
  • Re: #2 Re: [SAtalk] getting spamd to work with sendmail Jeffrey Bacon
  • Re: #2 Re: [SAtalk] getting spamd to work with sendmail Craig Hughes
  • Re: #2 Re: [SAtalk] getting spamd to work with sendmail Jeffrey J. Bacon
• [SAtalk] Some email that confure mass-check Olivier Nicole
• [SAtalk] SA's performance with mailing lists Kerry Nice
  • Re: [SAtalk] SA's performance with mailing lists Kenneth Chen
  • RE: [SAtalk] SA's performance with mailing lists CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson
  • RE: [SAtalk] SA's performance with mailing lists Kenneth Chen
  • Re: [SAtalk] SA's performance with mailing lists Scott Doty
  • RE: [SAtalk] SA's performance with mailing lists CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson
  • Re: [SAtalk] SA's performance with mailing lists dman
  • Re: [SAtalk] SA's performance with mailing lists Craig Hughes
  • Re: [SAtalk] SA's performance with mailing lists dman
  • Re: [SAtalk] SA's performance with mailing lists Paul Traina
  • Re: [SAtalk] SA's performance with mailing lists Matthew Cline
  • RE: [SAtalk] SA's performance with mailing lists CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson
  • [SAtalk] Re: SA's performance with mailing lists Will Yardley
  • Re: [SAtalk] Re: SA's performance with mailing lists Craig Hughes
  • Re: [SAtalk] SA's performance with mailing lists Andrew Kohlsmith
  • [SAtalk] Re: SA's performance with mailing lists Will Yardley
  • Re: [SAtalk] SA's performance with mailing lists Matthew Cline
  • Re: [SAtalk] SA's performance with mailing lists Lars Hansson
  • Re: [SAtalk] SA's performance with mailing lists Kerry Nice
  • Re: [SAtalk] SA's performance with mailing lists Andrew Kohlsmith

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]