Kenneth Chen wrote: > Hey all: > > I've seen a large amount of code and patches come through this mailing > list that enhance the performance of SpamAssassin. However, I'm no perl > guru (or any other language) so I'm not sure what I'd do with all those > snippets of code. > > Is it safe to assume that the code that proves reliable and useful will > eventually make its way into a release version of SpamAssassin, for those > of us that are not sophisticated enough to patch our own installations? > > For example, I saw someone mention that they commented out the ORBZ check > since it went offline; I wouldn't even know where to begin to do that, but > that seems like a reasonable 'update' to SpamAssassin so I would hope to > see that check commented out in a future release.
You want to be checking out CVS (details on the web site). Unfortunately both Craig and I have been majorly busy with other stuff recently (while SA is actually my job now, I've been busy helping with other Perl based tasks at work), so quite a few patches have slipped by us. I've tried to keep a file with what I think are relevant bits to apply, which I'll get onto "soon". Matt. _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
