On Sunday 24 March 2002 10:43 pm, Michael Moncur wrote: > Matthew Cline wrote:
> > Right now there's test for spam phrase scores of 10, 20, 40, and 100. > > Why aren't there test for, say, 15, 25, and 30? If we're going to test > > for 40 and 100, shouldn't there also be a test for halfway in-between at > > 70? Is the current set of scores optimal in some way that I can't see? > Actually the current scores are about as non-optimal as they could possibly > get: > score SPAM_PHRASES_020 0.0 > score SPAM_PHRASES_030 0.0 > score SPAM_PHRASES_100 0.0 > (all from 50_scores.cf in the latest CVS) > Is the spam phrases system still broken? Or were these left turned off by > mistake? I turned them back on in my user_prefs file (forgot about that). Out of around 600 non-spam messages, it only got triggered 8 times. 5 or 6 of them were for notifications from Yahoo! Groups that a new file had been uploaded to a group I subscribe to, and the rest were from subscription or unsubscription notices from mailing lists or web-forums. I've added new tests for spam phrase scores of 15, 25, 30 and 35; I'll see how that goes. -- Visit http://dmoz.org, the world's | Give a man a match, and he'll be warm largest human edited web directory. | for a minute, but set him on fire, and | he'll be warm for the rest of his life. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: 132152059 | _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
