On 20 March 2002, Maurits Bloos said:
> Has anyone 'hacked' spamproxyd to send *SPAM* to both the intended recipient
> and to a 'spamtrap' mailbox ?
Why bother? I thought the point of spamproxyd was to allow rejecting
spam at SMTP-time. If you're just going to accept it anyways, then use
your regular SMTP daemon, pipe messages through SA at delivery time, and
save a copy. I'm sure this is easy to do with procmail or maildrop.
Greg
--
Greg Ward - software developer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MEMS Exchange http://www.mems-exchange.org
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
