They shouldn't get lost, but spam scanning will be aborted. In other words, spamc will notice that spamd vanished, and will just dump the unprocessed message back out.
In theory. C On Wed, 2002-03-20 at 10:40, Doug Herr wrote: > > If I wish to shut down spamd on a Redhat system without using the > rc script provided (using version 2.11 of SA), is there a proper > signal to send so that e-mail being scanned when the signal hits > don't get lost? > > Or would they not even be lost if I sent a sig KILL ? _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
