Hi, > -----Original Message----- > From: Greg Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: woensdag 20 maart 2002 17:43 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] spamproxyd : 'sending spam to a > spamtrap box & the > intended recip ient' > > > On 20 March 2002, Maurits Bloos said: > > Has anyone 'hacked' spamproxyd to send *SPAM* to both the > intended recipient > > and to a 'spamtrap' mailbox ? > > Why bother? I thought the point of spamproxyd was to allow rejecting > spam at SMTP-time. If you're just going to accept it > anyways, then use > your regular SMTP daemon, pipe messages through SA at > delivery time, and > save a copy. I'm sure this is easy to do with procmail or maildrop.
Well, my server running SA is a mail-gateway (crappy M$ Exchange behind it :-) ) I'm running Postfix on the Mail-Gateway, so i don't have to hook up a Windowze machine to the internet. My users want a way to 'easily' identify possible spam, and for me to analyze the headers from a forwarded message (in exchange) is impossible (exchange discards the headers). That's why I'm looking into a way to send it to a 'spamtrap' mailbox > Greg > -- > Greg Ward - software developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] > MEMS Exchange http://www.mems-exchange.org > _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
