On Wed, 20 Mar 2002, Greg Ward wrote:
> On 20 March 2002, Maurits Bloos said:
>> Has anyone 'hacked' spamproxyd to send *SPAM* to both the intended
>> recipient and to a 'spamtrap' mailbox ?
>
> Why bother? I thought the point of spamproxyd was to allow rejecting
> spam at SMTP-time.
Heck, no. I want an SMTP-based SpamAssasin myself, for use on my laptop,
because the cost of forking fives times per email, together with two
passes through the Postfix mail queue, is enough to make me notice the
delivery of email.
> If you're just going to accept it anyways, then use your regular SMTP
> daemon, pipe messages through SA at delivery time, and save a copy.
> I'm sure this is easy to do with procmail or maildrop.
This still requires more forks than before, though less of them,
thankfully.
Daniel
--
I'd harbored hopes that the intelligence that once inhabited novels
or films would ingest rock. I was, perhaps, wrong.
-- Lou Reed
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
