On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 02:58:52PM -0800, Craig Hughes wrote: > I think this is a more substantial problem than that which requires a > bit more work. Thanks for the patch though. I've made a note in > bugzilla #115 about my intention to incorporate MIME::Tools for doing a > lot of the hard work for us. We should be able to easily knock out > several bugs by doing that, and at the same time considerably simplify > the SA code.
I agree with this, however, how easy/hard will it be to change the message body processing to use MIME::Tools? The reason I ask is that I suspect that the base64 decoding breakage is possibly partly responsible for the high score from the GA for BASE64_ENC_TEXT, since none of the other spam signs trip on a lot of them. So, unless you think the MIME::Tools integration could be done before the next release, I'd like to suggest my patch as a short-term solution, it at least fixes the current method. (That is, unless you see something wrong with the patch.) Dan. _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
