> Right now there's test for spam phrase scores of 10, 20, 40, and 100. Why > aren't there test for, say, 15, 25, and 30? If we're going to test for 40 > and 100, shouldn't there also be a test for halfway in-between at > 70? Is the > current set of scores optimal in some way that I can't see?
Actually the current scores are about as non-optimal as they could possibly get: score SPAM_PHRASES_020 0.0 score SPAM_PHRASES_030 0.0 score SPAM_PHRASES_100 0.0 (all from 50_scores.cf in the latest CVS) Is the spam phrases system still broken? Or were these left turned off by mistake? I believe the issues with really short messages getting high scores were fixed and the system should be worth *something* now... -- michael moncur mgm at starlingtech.com http://www.starlingtech.com/ "Talk sense to a fool and he calls you foolish." -- Euripides _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
