Justin Mason wrote: > g'day! quick patch follows... > > --j. > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Patch for SpamAssassin > From: "Ryan Snodgrass" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Justin, > > SpamAssassin is rock solid! Thanks for writing this. > > So after having SpamAssassin running for a while in the base > configuration I decided to add Razor integration. Except things didn't > necessarily go so well after doing the install and SpamAssassin started > failing mysteriously. The problem was a Razor configuration problem but > SA should have been able to recover from this and at least handle in a > gracefully degraded maner. The root of the problem was the die() if > Razor::Client wasn't instantiated. > > In this case we should really just emit a warning and not die. We want > SpamAssassin to continue to process the e-mail, just without Razor > checking. Also in the event of an exception we want to make sure > $response is set back to undef so that this method returns as if it > didn't run Razor. The following diff of Dns.pm shows the changes:
Applied, thanks. Matt. _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
