Kerry, Could you try adding the tests that Matthew recently posted specifically for lists? Would be interesting to see how or if these change your results. Here they are:
Here's some rules that I have for lists: # Only look for 7 bit chars between square brackets, because a lot # of spam with 8 bit chars in the subject would match this rule header ELIST_1 Subject =~ /^.{0,6}\[[\000-\177]{2,20}\]/ describe ELIST_1 Subject has something between square brackets header ELIST_2 List-Unsubscribe =~ /./ describe ELIST_2 List-Unsubscribe field exists header ELIST_3 X-Original-Date =~ /./ describe ELIST_3 X-Original-Date field exists header ELIST_4 Errors-To =~ /./ describe ELIST_4 Errors-To field exists header ELIST_5 Precedence =~ /bulk/i describe ELIST_5 Prescendce is bulk header ELIST_6 Mailing-List =~ /./ describe ELIST_6 Mailing List field exists header ELIST_7 ALL =~ /(?:noreply|nobody)\@(?!localhost)/i describe ELIST_7 Reply to nodoby/noreply score ELIST_1 -1.0 score ELIST_2 -1.0 score ELIST_3 -1.0 score ELIST_4 -1.0 score ELIST_5 -1.0 score ELIST_6 -1.0 score ELIST_7 -1.0 > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kerry > Nice > Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 10:39 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [SAtalk] SA's performance with mailing lists > > > I saw in the Lockergnome newsletter I received today, Spamassassin was > slammed big time. I do see his point though. Does SA really do that > great of a job with newsletters and journals? > > Just as an exercise, I ran though my journals folder though SA and it > wasn't pretty. These are all mailing lists that I subscribe to in this > folder. There were about 2000 emails covering about two years, about > 100 recent ones from the last month or so and the rest were things that > I haven't gotten around to deleting yet. > > Out of those, 213 hit over 5 and a lot of them scored in double digits. > Pretty much every one of the Lockergnome journals scored about 15. I > never see this since as a matter of habit procmail filters all my > mailing lists to another folder before SA sees any of them. > > Is this just the journals I read or does this seem like a really big > problem to others? I know these can be whitelisted (and in my case, > procmail takes care of them), but if an ISP, for example, is going to > use SA, lots of people are going to get legitmate mail filtered and will > have to go hunting for it in their caught mail folder. > > I think it does a great job with personal emails, you know, letters to > mom and friends, but mailing lists seem to contain so many of the spammy > sorts of things, they really don't score well. > > If anybody wants to look at the emails, let me know and I'll send the > file of emails that failed the test along. > > Kerry. > > > _______________________________________________ > Spamassassin-talk mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk > _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk