On 21 March 2002, Theo Van Dinter said:
> What I'm arguing is: don't replace the regexp of INVALID_MSGID with one
> that isn't actually checking for invalid message-ids.
Right, understood. Makes sense to me.
> Adding a new test that looks for ".+@.+\..+" would be fine by me, since it's
> a new test that looks for something different.
Totally agreed.
Greg
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
