auth48archive  

Messages by Date

• 2024/12/23 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9702 <draft-ietf-mpls-msd-yang-12> for your review Sandy Ginoza via auth48archive
• 2024/12/23 [auth48] Re: Cluster-Wide Questions for Cluster 508: RFCs 9621, 9622, and 9623 (draft-ietf-taps-arch-19, draft-ietf-taps-interface-26, and draft-ietf-taps-impl-18) Megan Ferguson via auth48archive
• 2024/12/23 [auth48] Re: [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9699 <draft-ietf-mops-ar-use-case-18> for your review Leslie Daigle (ThinkingCat) via auth48archive
• 2024/12/22 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9703 <draft-ietf-mpls-sr-epe-oam-19> for your review Shraddha Hegde via auth48archive
• 2024/12/22 [auth48] Re: [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9699 <draft-ietf-mops-ar-use-case-18> for your review Rebecca VanRheenen via auth48archive
• 2024/12/22 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9672 <draft-wkumari-rfc8110-to-ieee-02> for your review Warren Kumari via auth48archive
• 2024/12/22 [auth48] Re: Cluster-Wide Questions for Cluster 508: RFCs 9621, 9622, and 9623 (draft-ietf-taps-arch-19, draft-ietf-taps-interface-26, and draft-ietf-taps-impl-18) Philipp S. Tiesel via auth48archive
• 2024/12/21 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9708 <draft-ietf-lamps-rfc8708bis-03> for your review Russ Housley via auth48archive
• 2024/12/21 [auth48] Re: [AD] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9699 <draft-ietf-mops-ar-use-case-18> for your review Renan Krishna via auth48archive
• 2024/12/20 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9702 <draft-ietf-mpls-msd-yang-12> for your review Jeff Tantsura via auth48archive
• 2024/12/20 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9699 <draft-ietf-mops-ar-use-case-18> for your review Akbar Rahman via auth48archive
• 2024/12/20 [auth48] Re: Cluster-Wide Questions for Cluster 508: RFCs 9621, 9622, and 9623 (draft-ietf-taps-arch-19, draft-ietf-taps-interface-26, and draft-ietf-taps-impl-18) Megan Ferguson via auth48archive
• 2024/12/20 [auth48] Re: Cluster-Wide Questions for Cluster 508: RFCs 9621, 9622, and 9623 (draft-ietf-taps-arch-19, draft-ietf-taps-interface-26, and draft-ietf-taps-impl-18) Michael Welzl via auth48archive
• 2024/12/20 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9708 <draft-ietf-lamps-rfc8708bis-03> for your review RFC Editor via auth48archive
• 2024/12/20 [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9708 <draft-ietf-lamps-rfc8708bis-03> for your review RFC Editor via auth48archive
• 2024/12/20 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9706 <draft-ietf-mops-treedn-07> for your review Leonard Giuliano via auth48archive
• 2024/12/20 [auth48] Re: Cluster-Wide Questions for Cluster 508: RFCs 9621, 9622, and 9623 (draft-ietf-taps-arch-19, draft-ietf-taps-interface-26, and draft-ietf-taps-impl-18) Megan Ferguson via auth48archive
• 2024/12/20 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9702 <draft-ietf-mpls-msd-yang-12> for your review Yingzhen Qu via auth48archive
• 2024/12/20 [auth48] Re: [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9626 <draft-ietf-avtext-framemarking-16> for your review Megan Ferguson via auth48archive
• 2024/12/20 [auth48] Re: [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9628 <draft-ietf-payload-vp9-16> for your review Megan Ferguson via auth48archive
• 2024/12/20 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9627 <draft-ietf-avtext-lrr-07> for your review Megan Ferguson via auth48archive
• 2024/12/20 [auth48] Re: [IAB] No longer at CDT (Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9707 <draft-iab-bias-workshop-report-02> for your review) Mallory Knodel via auth48archive
• 2024/12/20 [auth48] [AD] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9699 <draft-ietf-mops-ar-use-case-18> for your review Rebecca VanRheenen via auth48archive
• 2024/12/20 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9678 <draft-ietf-emu-aka-pfs-12> for your review Megan Ferguson via auth48archive
• 2024/12/20 [auth48] Re: [IAB] No longer at CDT (Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9707 <draft-iab-bias-workshop-report-02> for your review) Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF) via auth48archive
• 2024/12/20 [auth48] Re: Cluster-Wide Questions for Cluster 508: RFCs 9621, 9622, and 9623 (draft-ietf-taps-arch-19, draft-ietf-taps-interface-26, and draft-ietf-taps-impl-18) Megan Ferguson via auth48archive
• 2024/12/20 [auth48] Re: [IAB] Re: No longer at CDT (Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9707 <draft-iab-bias-workshop-report-02> for your review) Wes Hardaker via auth48archive
• 2024/12/20 [auth48] Re: Cluster-Wide Questions for Cluster 508: RFCs 9621, 9622, and 9623 (draft-ietf-taps-arch-19, draft-ietf-taps-interface-26, and draft-ietf-taps-impl-18) Michael Welzl via auth48archive
• 2024/12/20 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9707 <draft-iab-bias-workshop-report-02> for your review Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF) via auth48archive
• 2024/12/20 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9702 <draft-ietf-mpls-msd-yang-12> for your review Madison Church via auth48archive
• 2024/12/20 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9702 <draft-ietf-mpls-msd-yang-12> for your review Acee Lindem via auth48archive
• 2024/12/20 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9696 <draft-ietf-rift-applicability-17> for your review Madison Church via auth48archive
• 2024/12/20 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9702 <draft-ietf-mpls-msd-yang-12> for your review Madison Church via auth48archive
• 2024/12/20 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9703 <draft-ietf-mpls-sr-epe-oam-19> for your review Sarah Tarrant via auth48archive
• 2024/12/20 [auth48] Re: No longer at CDT (Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9707 <draft-iab-bias-workshop-report-02> for your review) Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF) via auth48archive
• 2024/12/20 [auth48] Re: *[AD] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9704 <draft-ietf-add-split-horizon-authority-14> for your review Ben Schwartz via auth48archive
• 2024/12/20 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9699 <draft-ietf-mops-ar-use-case-18> for your review Eric Vyncke (evyncke) via auth48archive
• 2024/12/20 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9699 <draft-ietf-mops-ar-use-case-18> for your review Renan Krishna via auth48archive
• 2024/12/20 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9699 <draft-ietf-mops-ar-use-case-18> for your review Renan Krishna via auth48archive
• 2024/12/20 [auth48] Re: Cluster-Wide Questions for Cluster 508: RFCs 9621, 9622, and 9623 (draft-ietf-taps-arch-19, draft-ietf-taps-interface-26, and draft-ietf-taps-impl-18) Mirja Kuehlewind via auth48archive
• 2024/12/20 [auth48] Re: *[AD] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9704 <draft-ietf-add-split-horizon-authority-14> for your review Eric Vyncke (evyncke) via auth48archive
• 2024/12/20 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9700 <draft-ietf-oauth-security-topics-29> for your review Daniel Fett via auth48archive
• 2024/12/20 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9699 <draft-ietf-mops-ar-use-case-18> for your review Renan Krishna via auth48archive
• 2024/12/19 [auth48] Re: Cluster-Wide Questions for Cluster 508: RFCs 9621, 9622, and 9623 (draft-ietf-taps-arch-19, draft-ietf-taps-interface-26, and draft-ietf-taps-impl-18) Michael Welzl via auth48archive
• 2024/12/19 [auth48] Re: Cluster-Wide Questions for Cluster 508: RFCs 9621, 9622, and 9623 (draft-ietf-taps-arch-19, draft-ietf-taps-interface-26, and draft-ietf-taps-impl-18) Megan Ferguson via auth48archive
• 2024/12/19 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9703 <draft-ietf-mpls-sr-epe-oam-19> for your review Shraddha Hegde via auth48archive
• 2024/12/19 [auth48] Re: Cluster-Wide Questions for Cluster 508: RFCs 9621, 9622, and 9623 (draft-ietf-taps-arch-19, draft-ietf-taps-interface-26, and draft-ietf-taps-impl-18) Michael Welzl via auth48archive
• 2024/12/19 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9696 <draft-ietf-rift-applicability-17> for your review wei.yuehua--- via auth48archive
• 2024/12/19 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9700 <draft-ietf-oauth-security-topics-29> for your review Alice Russo via auth48archive
• 2024/12/19 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9705 <draft-ietf-mpls-ri-rsvp-frr-22> for your review RFC Editor via auth48archive
• 2024/12/19 [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9705 <draft-ietf-mpls-ri-rsvp-frr-22> for your review RFC Editor via auth48archive
• 2024/12/19 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9699 <draft-ietf-mops-ar-use-case-18> for your review Rebecca VanRheenen via auth48archive
• 2024/12/19 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9702 <draft-ietf-mpls-msd-yang-12> for your review Acee Lindem via auth48archive
• 2024/12/19 [auth48] Re: Cluster-Wide Questions for Cluster 508: RFCs 9621, 9622, and 9623 (draft-ietf-taps-arch-19, draft-ietf-taps-interface-26, and draft-ietf-taps-impl-18) Reese Enghardt via auth48archive
• 2024/12/19 [auth48] *[AD] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9704 <draft-ietf-add-split-horizon-authority-14> for your review Lynne Bartholomew via auth48archive
• 2024/12/19 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9679 <draft-ietf-cose-key-thumbprint-06> for your review Karen Moore via auth48archive
• 2024/12/19 [auth48] Re: Cluster-Wide Questions for Cluster 508: RFCs 9621, 9622, and 9623 (draft-ietf-taps-arch-19, draft-ietf-taps-interface-26, and draft-ietf-taps-impl-18) Megan Ferguson via auth48archive
• 2024/12/19 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9707 <draft-iab-bias-workshop-report-02> for your review Lynne Bartholomew via auth48archive
• 2024/12/19 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9703 <draft-ietf-mpls-sr-epe-oam-19> for your review Sarah Tarrant via auth48archive
• 2024/12/19 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9703 <draft-ietf-mpls-sr-epe-oam-19> for your review kapil arora via auth48archive
• 2024/12/19 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9703 <draft-ietf-mpls-sr-epe-oam-19> for your review Shraddha Hegde via auth48archive
• 2024/12/19 [auth48] Re: [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9679 <draft-ietf-cose-key-thumbprint-06> for your review Hannes Tschofenig via auth48archive
• 2024/12/18 [auth48] Re: Cluster-Wide Questions for Cluster 508: RFCs 9621, 9622, and 9623 (draft-ietf-taps-arch-19, draft-ietf-taps-interface-26, and draft-ietf-taps-impl-18) God Chosen via auth48archive
• 2024/12/18 [auth48] Re: Cluster-Wide Questions for Cluster 508: RFCs 9621, 9622, and 9623 (draft-ietf-taps-arch-19, draft-ietf-taps-interface-26, and draft-ietf-taps-impl-18) Michael Welzl via auth48archive
• 2024/12/18 [auth48] Re: Cluster-Wide Questions for Cluster 508: RFCs 9621, 9622, and 9623 (draft-ietf-taps-arch-19, draft-ietf-taps-interface-26, and draft-ietf-taps-impl-18) Michael Welzl via auth48archive
• 2024/12/18 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9707 <draft-iab-bias-workshop-report-02> for your review Dhruv Dhody via auth48archive
• 2024/12/18 [auth48] Re: Cluster-Wide Questions for Cluster 508: RFCs 9621, 9622, and 9623 (draft-ietf-taps-arch-19, draft-ietf-taps-interface-26, and draft-ietf-taps-impl-18) Michael Welzl via auth48archive
• 2024/12/18 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9706 <draft-ietf-mops-treedn-07> for your review RFC Editor via auth48archive
• 2024/12/18 [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9706 <draft-ietf-mops-treedn-07> for your review RFC Editor via auth48archive
• 2024/12/18 [auth48] Re: Cluster-Wide Questions for Cluster 508: RFCs 9621, 9622, and 9623 (draft-ietf-taps-arch-19, draft-ietf-taps-interface-26, and draft-ietf-taps-impl-18) Reese Enghardt via auth48archive
• 2024/12/18 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9639 <draft-ietf-cellar-flac-14> for your review Alice Russo via auth48archive
• 2024/12/18 [auth48] Re: Cluster-Wide Questions for Cluster 508: RFCs 9621, 9622, and 9623 (draft-ietf-taps-arch-19, draft-ietf-taps-interface-26, and draft-ietf-taps-impl-18) Colin Perkins via auth48archive
• 2024/12/18 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9698 <draft-ietf-extra-jmapaccess-09> for your review Sandy Ginoza via auth48archive
• 2024/12/18 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9704 <draft-ietf-add-split-horizon-authority-14> for your review Ben Schwartz via auth48archive
• 2024/12/18 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9703 <draft-ietf-mpls-sr-epe-oam-19> for your review Sarah Tarrant via auth48archive
• 2024/12/18 [auth48] Re: [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9679 <draft-ietf-cose-key-thumbprint-06> for your review Karen Moore via auth48archive
• 2024/12/18 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9623 <draft-ietf-taps-impl-18> for your review Megan Ferguson via auth48archive
• 2024/12/18 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9621 <draft-ietf-taps-arch-19> for your review Megan Ferguson via auth48archive
• 2024/12/18 [auth48] Re: No longer at CDT (Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9707 <draft-iab-bias-workshop-report-02> for your review) Lynne Bartholomew via auth48archive
• 2024/12/18 [auth48] Re: Cluster-Wide Questions for Cluster 508: RFCs 9621, 9622, and 9623 (draft-ietf-taps-arch-19, draft-ietf-taps-interface-26, and draft-ietf-taps-impl-18) Megan Ferguson via auth48archive
• 2024/12/18 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9622 <draft-ietf-taps-interface-26> for your review Megan Ferguson via auth48archive
• 2024/12/18 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9707 <draft-iab-bias-workshop-report-02> for your review Lynne Bartholomew via auth48archive
• 2024/12/18 [auth48] Re: [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9679 <draft-ietf-cose-key-thumbprint-06> for your review Paul Wouters via auth48archive
• 2024/12/18 [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9679 <draft-ietf-cose-key-thumbprint-06> for your review Karen Moore via auth48archive
• 2024/12/18 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9703 <draft-ietf-mpls-sr-epe-oam-19> for your review Samson via auth48archive
• 2024/12/18 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9703 <draft-ietf-mpls-sr-epe-oam-19> for your review Mukul Srivastava via auth48archive
• 2024/12/18 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9696 <draft-ietf-rift-applicability-17> for your review Madison Church via auth48archive
• 2024/12/18 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9703 <draft-ietf-mpls-sr-epe-oam-19> for your review Shraddha Hegde via auth48archive
• 2024/12/17 [auth48] Re: error in the PDF -Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9639 <draft-ietf-cellar-flac-14> for your review Martijn van Beurden via auth48archive
• 2024/12/17 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9696 <draft-ietf-rift-applicability-17> for your review wei.yuehua--- via auth48archive
• 2024/12/17 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9696 <draft-ietf-rift-applicability-17> for your review zhang via auth48archive
• 2024/12/17 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9672 <draft-wkumari-rfc8110-to-ieee-02> for your review Sandy Ginoza via auth48archive
• 2024/12/17 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9696 <draft-ietf-rift-applicability-17> for your review Madison Church via auth48archive
• 2024/12/17 [auth48] Re: error in the PDF -Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9639 <draft-ietf-cellar-flac-14> for your review Alice Russo via auth48archive
• 2024/12/17 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9698 <draft-ietf-extra-jmapaccess-09> for your review Arnt Gulbrandsen via auth48archive
• 2024/12/17 [auth48] Re: Cluster-Wide Questions for Cluster 508: RFCs 9621, 9622, and 9623 (draft-ietf-taps-arch-19, draft-ietf-taps-interface-26, and draft-ietf-taps-impl-18) Megan Ferguson via auth48archive
• 2024/12/17 [auth48] Re: What's next? -- Re: Second part -- Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9693 <draft-ietf-bmwg-benchmarking-stateful-09> for your review Alanna Paloma via auth48archive
• 2024/12/17 [auth48] What's next? -- Re: Second part -- Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9693 <draft-ietf-bmwg-benchmarking-stateful-09> for your review Dr . Lencse Gábor via auth48archive
• 2024/12/16 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9696 <draft-ietf-rift-applicability-17> for your review wei.yuehua--- via auth48archive
• 2024/12/16 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9707 <draft-iab-bias-workshop-report-02> for your review Dhruv Dhody via auth48archive
• 2024/12/16 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9707 <draft-iab-bias-workshop-report-02> for your review Dhruv Dhody via auth48archive
• 2024/12/16 [auth48] Re: Cluster-Wide Questions for Cluster 508: RFCs 9621, 9622, and 9623 (draft-ietf-taps-arch-19, draft-ietf-taps-interface-26, and draft-ietf-taps-impl-18) Michael Welzl via auth48archive
• 2024/12/16 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9707 <draft-iab-bias-workshop-report-02> for your review RFC Editor via auth48archive
• 2024/12/16 [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9707 <draft-iab-bias-workshop-report-02> for your review RFC Editor via auth48archive
• 2024/12/16 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9703 <draft-ietf-mpls-sr-epe-oam-19> for your review Sarah Tarrant via auth48archive
• 2024/12/16 [auth48] Re: Cluster-Wide Questions for Cluster 508: RFCs 9621, 9622, and 9623 (draft-ietf-taps-arch-19, draft-ietf-taps-interface-26, and draft-ietf-taps-impl-18) Megan Ferguson via auth48archive
• 2024/12/16 [auth48] Re: [Ext] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9609 <draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8109bis-07> for your review Lynne Bartholomew via auth48archive
• 2024/12/16 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9693 <draft-ietf-bmwg-benchmarking-stateful-09> for your review God Chosen via auth48archive
• 2024/12/16 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9693 <draft-ietf-bmwg-benchmarking-stateful-09> for your review Alanna Paloma via auth48archive
• 2024/12/16 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9698 <draft-ietf-extra-jmapaccess-09> for your review Sandy Ginoza via auth48archive
• 2024/12/16 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9610 <draft-ietf-jmap-contacts-10> for your review Orie Steele via auth48archive
• 2024/12/16 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9676 <draft-spinosa-urn-lex-24> for your review Madison Church via auth48archive
• 2024/12/16 [auth48] Re: [AD] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9693 <draft-ietf-bmwg-benchmarking-stateful-09> for your review Warren Kumari via auth48archive
• 2024/12/16 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9610 <draft-ietf-jmap-contacts-10> for your review Murray S. Kucherawy via auth48archive
• 2024/12/16 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9610 <draft-ietf-jmap-contacts-10> for your review Madison Church via auth48archive
• 2024/12/16 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9702 <draft-ietf-mpls-msd-yang-12> for your review Madison Church via auth48archive
• 2024/12/16 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9702 <draft-ietf-mpls-msd-yang-12> for your review Acee Lindem via auth48archive
• 2024/12/16 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9678 <draft-ietf-emu-aka-pfs-12> for your review Karl Norrman via auth48archive
• 2024/12/16 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9676 <draft-spinosa-urn-lex-24> for your review Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear) via auth48archive
• 2024/12/16 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9676 <draft-spinosa-urn-lex-24> for your review ENRICO FRANCESCONI via auth48archive
• 2024/12/15 [auth48] 答复: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9703 <draft-ietf-mpls-sr-epe-oam-19> for your review Tiger Xu via auth48archive
• 2024/12/15 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9610 <draft-ietf-jmap-contacts-10> for your review Neil Jenkins via auth48archive
• 2024/12/13 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9610 <draft-ietf-jmap-contacts-10> for your review Murray S. Kucherawy via auth48archive
• 2024/12/13 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9703 <draft-ietf-mpls-sr-epe-oam-19> for your review RFC Editor via auth48archive
• 2024/12/13 [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9703 <draft-ietf-mpls-sr-epe-oam-19> for your review RFC Editor via auth48archive
• 2024/12/13 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9704 <draft-ietf-add-split-horizon-authority-14> for your review RFC Editor via auth48archive
• 2024/12/13 [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9704 <draft-ietf-add-split-horizon-authority-14> for your review RFC Editor via auth48archive
• 2024/12/13 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9623 <draft-ietf-taps-impl-18> for your review Tommy Pauly via auth48archive
• 2024/12/13 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9621 <draft-ietf-taps-arch-19> for your review Tommy Pauly via auth48archive
• 2024/12/13 [auth48] Re: Cluster-Wide Questions for Cluster 508: RFCs 9621, 9622, and 9623 (draft-ietf-taps-arch-19, draft-ietf-taps-interface-26, and draft-ietf-taps-impl-18) Tommy Pauly via auth48archive
• 2024/12/13 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9678 <draft-ietf-emu-aka-pfs-12> for your review Jari Arkko via auth48archive
• 2024/12/13 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9621 <draft-ietf-taps-arch-19> for your review Gorry Fairhurst via auth48archive
• 2024/12/13 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9610 <draft-ietf-jmap-contacts-10> for your review Neil Jenkins via auth48archive
• 2024/12/12 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9702 <draft-ietf-mpls-msd-yang-12> for your review Yingzhen Qu via auth48archive
• 2024/12/12 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9692 <draft-ietf-rift-rift-24> for your review Pascal Thubert via auth48archive
• 2024/12/12 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9692 <draft-ietf-rift-rift-24> for your review Alanna Paloma via auth48archive
• 2024/12/12 [auth48] Re: Cluster-Wide Questions for Cluster 508: RFCs 9621, 9622, and 9623 (draft-ietf-taps-arch-19, draft-ietf-taps-interface-26, and draft-ietf-taps-impl-18) Megan Ferguson via auth48archive
• 2024/12/12 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9623 <draft-ietf-taps-impl-18> for your review Megan Ferguson via auth48archive
• 2024/12/12 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9622 <draft-ietf-taps-interface-26> for your review Megan Ferguson via auth48archive
• 2024/12/12 [auth48] Re: error in the PDF -Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9639 <draft-ietf-cellar-flac-14> for your review Michael Richardson via auth48archive
• 2024/12/12 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9701 <draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-introspection-response-12> for your review Alanna Paloma via auth48archive
• 2024/12/12 [auth48] Re: [IANA #1408111] [IANA] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9701 <draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-introspection-response-12> for your review Alanna Paloma via auth48archive
• 2024/12/12 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9610 <draft-ietf-jmap-contacts-10> for your review Madison Church via auth48archive
• 2024/12/12 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9691 <draft-ietf-sidrops-signed-tal-16> for your review Madison Church via auth48archive
• 2024/12/12 [auth48] Re: [IANA #1408906] [IANA] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9691 <draft-ietf-sidrops-signed-tal-16> for your review Madison Church via auth48archive
• 2024/12/12 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9692 <draft-ietf-rift-rift-24> for your review Pascal Thubert via auth48archive
• 2024/12/12 [auth48] Re: error in the PDF -Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9639 <draft-ietf-cellar-flac-14> for your review Martijn van Beurden via auth48archive
• 2024/12/12 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9676 <draft-spinosa-urn-lex-24> for your review Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear) via auth48archive
• 2024/12/12 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9698 <draft-ietf-extra-jmapaccess-09> for your review Arnt Gulbrandsen via auth48archive
• 2024/12/11 [auth48] Re: error in the PDF -Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9639 <draft-ietf-cellar-flac-14> for your review Martijn van Beurden via auth48archive
• 2024/12/11 [auth48] [IANA #1408111] [IANA] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9701 <draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-introspection-response-12> for your review Amanda Baber via RT via auth48archive
• 2024/12/11 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9610 <draft-ietf-jmap-contacts-10> for your review Neil Jenkins via auth48archive
• 2024/12/11 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9702 <draft-ietf-mpls-msd-yang-12> for your review RFC Editor via auth48archive
• 2024/12/11 [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9702 <draft-ietf-mpls-msd-yang-12> for your review RFC Editor via auth48archive
• 2024/12/11 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9696 <draft-ietf-rift-applicability-17> for your review RFC Editor via auth48archive
• 2024/12/11 [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9696 <draft-ietf-rift-applicability-17> for your review RFC Editor via auth48archive
• 2024/12/11 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9672 <draft-wkumari-rfc8110-to-ieee-02> for your review Sandy Ginoza via auth48archive
• 2024/12/11 [auth48] Re: error in the PDF -Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9639 <draft-ietf-cellar-flac-14> for your review Sandy Ginoza via auth48archive
• 2024/12/11 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9698 <draft-ietf-extra-jmapaccess-09> for your review Sandy Ginoza via auth48archive
• 2024/12/11 [auth48] [IANA #1408906] [IANA] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9691 <draft-ietf-sidrops-signed-tal-16> for your review Sabrina Tanamal via RT via auth48archive
• 2024/12/11 [auth48] [IANA] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9691 <draft-ietf-sidrops-signed-tal-16> for your review Madison Church via auth48archive
• 2024/12/11 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9691 <draft-ietf-sidrops-signed-tal-16> for your review Madison Church via auth48archive
• 2024/12/10 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9691 <draft-ietf-sidrops-signed-tal-16> for your review Rob Austein via auth48archive
• 2024/12/10 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9676 <draft-spinosa-urn-lex-24> for your review ENRICO FRANCESCONI via auth48archive
• 2024/12/10 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9621 <draft-ietf-taps-arch-19> for your review Megan Ferguson via auth48archive
• 2024/12/10 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9610 <draft-ietf-jmap-contacts-10> for your review Madison Church via auth48archive
• 2024/12/10 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9676 <draft-spinosa-urn-lex-24> for your review ENRICO FRANCESCONI via auth48archive
• 2024/12/10 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9676 <draft-spinosa-urn-lex-24> for your review Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear) via auth48archive
• 2024/12/10 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9676 <draft-spinosa-urn-lex-24> for your review Madison Church via auth48archive
• 2024/12/10 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9610 <draft-ietf-jmap-contacts-10> for your review Madison Church via auth48archive
• 2024/12/10 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9692 <draft-ietf-rift-rift-24> for your review Jordan Head via auth48archive
• 2024/12/10 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9621 <draft-ietf-taps-arch-19> for your review Gorry Fairhurst via auth48archive
• 2024/12/09 [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9699 <draft-ietf-mops-ar-use-case-18> for your review RFC Editor via auth48archive
• 2024/12/09 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9699 <draft-ietf-mops-ar-use-case-18> for your review RFC Editor via auth48archive
• 2024/12/09 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9623 <draft-ietf-taps-impl-18> for your review Reese Enghardt via auth48archive
• 2024/12/09 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9692 <draft-ietf-rift-rift-24> for your review RFC Editor via auth48archive
• 2024/12/09 [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9692 <draft-ietf-rift-rift-24> for your review RFC Editor via auth48archive
• 2024/12/09 [auth48] [IANA] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9701 <draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-introspection-response-12> for your review Alanna Paloma via auth48archive
• 2024/12/09 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9701 <draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-introspection-response-12> for your review Alanna Paloma via auth48archive
• 2024/12/09 [auth48] [AD] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9693 <draft-ietf-bmwg-benchmarking-stateful-09> for your review Alanna Paloma via auth48archive
• 2024/12/09 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9621 <draft-ietf-taps-arch-19> for your review Megan Ferguson via auth48archive
• 2024/12/09 [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9679 <draft-ietf-cose-key-thumbprint-06> for your review Karen Moore via auth48archive
• 2024/12/09 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9621 <draft-ietf-taps-arch-19> for your review Michael Welzl via auth48archive
• 2024/12/09 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9621 <draft-ietf-taps-arch-19> for your review Megan Ferguson via auth48archive
• 2024/12/09 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9621 <draft-ietf-taps-arch-19> for your review Michael Welzl via auth48archive
• 2024/12/09 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9621 <draft-ietf-taps-arch-19> for your review Megan Ferguson via auth48archive
• 2024/12/09 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9700 <draft-ietf-oauth-security-topics-29> for your review Alice Russo via auth48archive
• 2024/12/09 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9679 <draft-ietf-cose-key-thumbprint-06> for your review Orie Steele via auth48archive
• 2024/12/09 [auth48] Re: Cluster-Wide Questions for Cluster 508: RFCs 9621, 9622, and 9623 (draft-ietf-taps-arch-19, draft-ietf-taps-interface-26, and draft-ietf-taps-impl-18) Megan Ferguson via auth48archive
• 2024/12/09 [auth48] Re: [Ext] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9609 <draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8109bis-07> for your review Lynne Bartholomew via auth48archive
• 2024/12/09 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9623 <draft-ietf-taps-impl-18> for your review Megan Ferguson via auth48archive
• 2024/12/09 [auth48] Re: [Ext] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9609 <draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8109bis-07> for your review Paul Hoffman via auth48archive
• 2024/12/09 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9701 <draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-introspection-response-12> for your review Vladimir Dzhuvinov / Connect2id via auth48archive
• 2024/12/09 [auth48] Re: [Ext] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9609 <draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8109bis-07> for your review Lynne Bartholomew via auth48archive
• 2024/12/09 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9701 <draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-introspection-response-12> for your review Alanna Paloma via auth48archive
• 2024/12/09 [auth48] Re: Cluster-Wide Questions for Cluster 508: RFCs 9621, 9622, and 9623 (draft-ietf-taps-arch-19, draft-ietf-taps-interface-26, and draft-ietf-taps-impl-18) Michael Welzl via auth48archive
• 2024/12/09 [auth48] Re: Cluster-Wide Questions for Cluster 508: RFCs 9621, 9622, and 9623 (draft-ietf-taps-arch-19, draft-ietf-taps-interface-26, and draft-ietf-taps-impl-18) Gorry Fairhurst via auth48archive
• 2024/12/09 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9700 <draft-ietf-oauth-security-topics-29> for your review Daniel Fett via auth48archive
• 2024/12/09 [auth48] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9623 <draft-ietf-taps-impl-18> for your review Michael Welzl via auth48archive
• 2024/12/09 [auth48] Re: Cluster-Wide Questions for Cluster 508: RFCs 9621, 9622, and 9623 (draft-ietf-taps-arch-19, draft-ietf-taps-interface-26, and draft-ietf-taps-impl-18) Michael Welzl via auth48archive

• Earlier messages
• Later messages